Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 25:12:626915.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.626915. eCollection 2021.

Impact of Ischemic Intra-Conditioning on Power Output and Bar Velocity of the Upper Limbs

Affiliations

Impact of Ischemic Intra-Conditioning on Power Output and Bar Velocity of the Upper Limbs

Michal Wilk et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of ischemic conditioning on power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise. Ten healthy males (age: 25 ± 2 years; body mass: 92 ± 8 kg; bench press one repetition maximum -1RM: 145 ± 13 kg), took part in two experimental sessions (with and without ischemia), 1 week apart in random and counterbalanced order. In the ischemic condition, cuffs placed around the upper part of the arms were inflated to 80% of arterial occlusion pressure before each set, while in the control condition there was no blood flow restriction. The exercise protocol included 5 sets of three repetitions each, against a resistance equal to 60% 1RM, with 5 min recovery intervals between sets. There was a main effect of condition for mean power output (MP) and mean bar velocity (MV) (p = 0.01), with overall MP being higher in ischemia than in control by 5.6 ± 4.1% (mean ± 90% compatibility limits), a standardized effect size (ES) of 0.51. Overall MV was also higher by 5.5 ± 4.0%, ES = 0.63. Peak power output (PP) and peak bar velocity (PV) were similar in set 1 of the control and ischemia condition (1039 ± 105 vs. 1054 ± 82 W; 684 ± 74 vs. 696 ± 53 W; 1.09 ± 0.07 vs. 1.12 ± 0.09 m/s; 0.81 ± 0.05 vs. 0.82 ± 0.05 m/s, p = 0.67 to 0.99, mean ± standard deviation). However, from set 3 onward (p = 0.03 to 0.001), PP and PV were higher in ischemia compared with control, with the highest difference observed in set 5 (10.9 ± 5.9%, ES = 0.73 for PP and 8.6 ± 4.6%; ES = 0.89 for PV). These results indicate that ischemia used before each set of the bench press exercise increases power output and bar velocity and this may be used as performance-enhancing stimulus during explosive resistance training.

Keywords: bench press; blood flow restriction; occlusion; resistance exercise; sport performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Power output and bar velocity during five successive sets of the bench press exercise in the ischemia (filled symbols) and control conditions (open symbols). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (A) Mean power output; (B) Peak power output; (C) Mean bar velocity; (D) Peak bar velocity.

References

    1. Andreas M., Schmid A., Keilani M., Doberer D., Bartko J., Crevenna R., et al. (2011). Effect of ischemic preconditioning in skeletal muscle measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: a randomized crossover trial. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reason. 13:32. 10.1186/1532-429x-13-32 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey T. G., Birk G. K., Cable N. T., Atkinson G., Green D. J., Jones H., et al. (2012). Remote ischemic preconditioning prevents reduction in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation after strenuous exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 303 H533–H538. - PubMed
    1. Bird S. P., Tarpenning K. M., Marino F. E. (2005). Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: a review of the acute programme variables. Sports Med. 35 841–851. 10.2165/00007256-200535100-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bogdanis G. C., Nevill M. E., Lakomy H. K. A., Boobis L. H. (1998). Power output and muscle metabolism during and following recovery from 10 and 20 s of maximal sprint exercise in humans. Acta Physiol. Scand. 163 261–272. 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1998.00378.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaouachi A., Poulos N., Abed F., Turki O., Brughelli M., Chamari K., et al. (2011). Volume, intensity, and timing of muscle power potentiation are variable. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 36 736–747. 10.1139/h11-079 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources