Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 26:12:640657.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.640657. eCollection 2021.

Efficacy of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wolfgang Kemmler  1 , Mahdieh Shojaa  1 , James Steele  2   3 , Joshua Berger  4 , Michael Fröhlich  4 , Daniel Schoene  1 , Simon von Stengel  1 , Heinz Kleinöder  5 , Matthias Kohl  6
Affiliations

Efficacy of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wolfgang Kemmler et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to determine the efficacy on whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on body composition and strength parameters in non-athletic cohorts. A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement included (a) controlled trials, (b) WB-EMS trials with at least one exercise and one control group, (c) WB-EMS as primary physical intervention, (d) WB-EMS with at least six electrodes covering most muscle groups, (e) non-athletic cohorts. We searched eight electronic databases up to June 30, 2020, without language restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMD) for muscle mass parameters, total body fat mass, maximum leg extension, and trunk extension strength were defined as outcome measures. In summary, 16 studies with 19 individual WB-EMS groups representing 897 participants were included. Studies vary considerably with respect to age, BMI, and physical conditions. Impulse protocols of the studies were roughly comparable, but training frequency (1-5 sessions/week) and intervention length (6-54 weeks) differed between the studies. SMD average was 1.23 (95%-CI: 0.71-1.76) for muscle mass, 0.98 (0.74-1.22) for maximum leg, and 1.08 (0.78-1.39) for maximum trunk extension strength changes (all p < 0.001). SMD for body fat changes (-0.40, [-0.98 to 0.17]), however, did not reach significance. I 2 and Q-statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity of muscle and fat mass changes between the trials. However, rank and regression tests did not indicate positive evidence for small-study bias and funnel plot asymmetries. This work provided further evidence for significant, large-sized effects of WB-EMS on muscle mass and strength parameters, but not on body fat mass. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO; ID: CRD42020183059.

Keywords: body composition; body fat mass; exercise; lean body mass; muscle strength; whole-body electromyostimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of meta-analysis results on muscle mass. The data are shown as pooled standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI for changes in WB-EMS and control groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot of the WB-EMS studies that addresses muscle mass.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of meta-analysis results on total body fat. The data are shown as pooled standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI for changes in WB-EMS and control groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot of the WB-EMS studies that addresses total body fat mass.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of meta-analysis results on maximum leg extension strength. The data are shown as pooled standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI for changes in WB-EMS and control groups.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot of the WB-EMS studies that addresses maximum leg extension strength.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of meta-analysis results on maximum trunk extension strength. The data are shown as pooled standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI for changes in WB-EMS and control groups.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Funnel plot of the WB-EMS studies that addresses maximum trunk extension strength.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amaro-Gahete F. J., De-la O. A., Jurado-Fasoli L., Dote-Montero M., Gutierrez A., Ruiz J. R., et al. . (2019a). Changes in physical fitness after 12 weeks of structured concurrent exercise training, high intensity interval training, or whole-body electromyostimulation training in sedentary middle-aged adults: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Physiol. 10:451. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaro-Gahete F. J., De-la O. A., Jurado-Fasoli L., Ruiz J. R., Castillo M. J., Gutierrez A. (2019b). Effects of different exercise training programs on body composition: a randomized control trial. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 29, 968–979. 10.1111/sms.13414 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amaro-Gahete F. J., De-la O. A., Sanchez-Delgado G., Robles-Gonzalez L., Jurado-Fasoli L., Ruiz J. R., et al. . (2018a). Functional exercise training and undulating periodization enhances the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation training on running performance. Front. Physiol. 9:720. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00720 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaro-Gahete F. J., De-la O. A., Sanchez-Delgado G., Robles-Gonzalez L., Jurado-Fasoli L., Ruiz J. R., et al. . (2018b). Whole-body electromyostimulation improves performance-related parameters in runners. Front. Physiol. 9:1576. 10.3389/fphys.2018.01576 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aristizabal J. C., Freidenreich D. J., Volk B. M., Kupchak B. R., Saenz C., Maresh C. M., et al. . (2015). Effect of resistance training on resting metabolic rate and its estimation by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry metabolic map. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, 831–836. 10.1038/ejcn.2014.216 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources