Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 25;11(2):209-222.
doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00086-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Can dynamic consent facilitate the protection of biomedical big data in biobanking in Malaysia?

Affiliations

Can dynamic consent facilitate the protection of biomedical big data in biobanking in Malaysia?

Mohammad Firdaus Abdul Aziz et al. Asian Bioeth Rev. .

Abstract

As with many other countries, Malaysia is also developing and promoting biomedical research to increase the understanding of human diseases and possible interventions. To facilitate this development, there is a significant growth of biobanks in the country to ensure continuous collection of biological samples for future research, which contain extremely important personal information and health data of the participants involved. Given the vast amount of samples and data accumulated by biobanks, they can be considered as reservoirs of precious biomedical big data. It is therefore imperative for biobanks to have in place regulatory measures to ensure ethical use of the biomedical big data. Malaysia has yet to introduce specific legislation for the field of biobanking. However, it can be argued that its existing Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA) has laid down legal principles that can be enforced to protect biomedical big data generated by the biobanks. Consent is a mechanism to enable data subjects to exercise their autonomy by determining how their data can be used and ensure compliance with legal principles. However, there are two main concerns surrounding the current practice of consent in biomedical big data in Malaysia. First, it is uncertain that the current practice would be able to respect the underlying notion of autonomy, and second, it is not in accordance with the legal principles of the PDPA. Scholars have deliberated on different strategies of informed consent, and a more interactive approach has recently been introduced: dynamic consent. It is argued that a dynamic consent approach would be able to address these concerns.

Keywords: Autonomy; Biobanking; Data protection; Dynamic consent; Informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asia Cohort Consortium. n.d. Participating Cohorts. available at https://www.asiacohort.org/ParticipatingCohorts/index.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.
    1. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Biller-Andorno, Nikola, and Alexander M. Capron. 2016. Ethical issues in governing biobanks: Global perspectives. New York: Routledge.
    1. Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle, Anne Marie Tassé, Bartha M. Knoppers, and Jennifer R. Harris. 2011. Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges? BMC Medical Genomics 4 (1): 69. 10.1186/1755-8794-4-69 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caulfield, Timothy. 2007. Biobanks and blanket consent: The proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. King’s Law Journal 18 (2): 209–226. 10.1080/09615768.2007.11427674

LinkOut - more resources