Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 25:11:645512.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.645512. eCollection 2021.

Specific and Sensitive Diagnosis of BCOR-ITD in Various Cancers by Digital PCR

Affiliations

Specific and Sensitive Diagnosis of BCOR-ITD in Various Cancers by Digital PCR

Doriane Barets et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

BCOR is an epigenetic regulator altered by various mechanisms including BCOR-internal tandem duplication (BCOR-ITD) in a wide range of cancers. Six different BCOR-ITD in the 3'-part of the coding sequence of exon 15 have been reported ranging from 89 to 114 bp in length. BCOR-ITD is a common genetic alteration found in clear cell sarcoma of the kidney and primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy (PMMTI) and it characterizes a new type of central nervous system tumor: "CNS tumor with BCOR-ITD". It can also be detected in undifferentiated round cell sarcoma (URCS) and in high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS). Therefore, it is of utmost importance to search for this genetic alteration in these cancers with the most frequent technique being RNA-sequencing. Here, we developed a new droplet PCR assay (dPCR) to detect the six sequences characterizing BCOR-ITD. To achieve this goal, we used a single colored probe to detect both the duplicated region and the normal sequence that acts as a reference. We first generated seven synthetic DNA sequences: ITD0 (the normal sequence) and ITD1 to ITD6 (the duplicated sequences described in the literature) and then we set up the optima dPCR conditions. We validated our assay on 19 samples from a representative panel of human tumors (9 HGNET-BCOR, 5 URCS, 3 HGESS, and 2 PMMTI) in which BCOR-ITD status was known using at least one other method including RNA sequencing, RT-PCR or DNA-methylation profiling for CNS tumors. Our results showed that our technique was 100% sensitive and specific. DPCR detected BCOR-ITD in 13/19 of the cases; in the remaining 6 cases additional RNA-sequencing revealed BCOR gene fusions. To conclude, in the era of histomolecular classification of human tumors, our modified dPCR assay is of particular interest to detect BCOR-ITD since it is a robust and less expensive test that can be applied to a broad spectrum of cancers that share this alteration.

Keywords: BCOR-internal tandem duplication; FFPE tissue; HGNET-BCOR; diagnostic marker; digital PCR assay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FF is Scientific Director of ID-Solutions, Grabels, France. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) dPCR for tandem duplication in one channel: W1 no template control; W2 normal sample; W3 homozygous ITD BCOR; W4 heterozygous ITD BCOR; forward primer; reverse primer; probe. (B) Position of primers and probe on synthetic sequences. ITD0: normal sequence; ITD1 to ITD6 sequences with internal tandem duplication (ITD). Forward primer in cyan; reverse primer in green; probe in yellow; invariable duplicated sequence in upper case; A: amplicon size; classic amplicon is underlined; long amplicon is underlined with dashes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Validation of the optima dPCR conditions. Three droplet clusters differ according to their fluorescence levels: lowest signal (1,000< >3,000 AU) for negative droplets (below black line), “normal” cluster (3,000< >5,000 AU) have the same intensity level as ITD0p (between black and pink line) and a third cluster of higher intensity (>5,000 AU) corresponding to a characteristic “BCOR-ITD” signal (above pink line). (A1) Nanodroplet cluster intensity for each pure artificial ITDsp . (A2) Log of the number of events as a function of the amplitude of the fluorescence allows a single threshold to be set for all samples and isoforms (pink line). (B1) Nanodroplet cluster intensity for each six mixed ITDs50 with 50% of ITD0p. (B2) Log of the number of events as a function of the amplitude of the fluorescence allows a single threshold to be set for all samples and 50% mixed isoforms (pink line). C+, FFPE positive control; NTC, no template control; ITDsp, pure synthetic DNA sequences; ITDs50, 50% mixed ITD1p to ITD6p with ITD0p.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity of BCOR-ITD detection. Results for serial dilutions of ITD1R (A1, 2, 3) and ITD4R (B1, 2, 3). (A1, B1) Linear correlation between expected fractional abundance of ITDs (x) and measured values (y). (A2, B2) The 1D plot showing the number of events for each fluorescence amplitude allowing to set a single threshold for all samples and isoforms (pink line). (A3, B3) The 1D plot showing for each dilution the positive events (BCOR-ITD) corresponding to the data points above the pink baseline marker, negative events at the bottom of the plot and reference events (BCOR-wildtype) between the two. C+, FFPE positive control; FA, fractional abundance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of BCOR-ITD detection by dPCR assay for six samples (BCOR-1, BCOR-17, BCOR-4, BCOR-6, BCOR-16, and BCOR-3). The 1D plot shows for each sample the positive events (BCOR-ITD) corresponding to the data points above the pink baseline marker, negative events at the bottom of the plot and reference events (BCOR-wildtype) between the two. Internal controls are analyzed at the same time: SW48 and H1650 cell lines which are BCOR-wildtype, duplicated and non-duplicated cases (C+ and C−), as well as NTC (no template control = water).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The place of dPCR for BCOR-ITD in the diagnostic workflow to reach a final diagnosis.

References

    1. Nagase T, Kikuno R, Nakayama M, Hirosawa M, Ohara O. Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XVIII. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res (2000) 7(4):273–81. 10.1093/dnares/7.4.271 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huynh KD, Fischle W, Verdin E, Bardwell VJ. BCoR, a novel corepressor involved in BCL-6 repression. Genes Dev (2000) 14(14):1810–23. 10.1101/gad.14.14.1810 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astolfi A, Fiore M, Melchionda F, Indio V, Bertuccio SN, Pession A. BCOR involvement in cancer. Epigenomics (2019) 11(7):835–55. 10.2217/epi-2018-0195 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panagopoulos I, Thorsen J, Gorunova L, Haugom L, Bjerkehagen B, Davidson B, et al. . Fusion of the ZC3H7B and BCOR genes in endometrial stromal sarcomas carrying an X;22-translocation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2013) 52(7):610–8. 10.1002/gcc.22057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoang LN, Aneja A, Conlon N, Delair DF, Middha S, Benayed R, et al. . Novel High-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: A Morphologic Mimicker of Myxoid Leiomyosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol (2017) 41(1):12–24. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000721 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources