Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 26:9:639595.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.639595. eCollection 2021.

Minimize the Xylitol Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Balancing the Xylose Redox Metabolic Pathway

Affiliations

Minimize the Xylitol Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Balancing the Xylose Redox Metabolic Pathway

Yixuan Zhu et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Xylose is the second most abundant sugar in lignocellulose, but it cannot be used as carbon source by budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rational promoter elements engineering approaches were taken for efficient xylose fermentation in budding yeast. Among promoters surveyed, HXT7 exhibited the best performance. The HXT7 promoter is suppressed in the presence of glucose and derepressed by xylose, making it a promising candidate to drive xylose metabolism. However, simple ectopic expression of both key xylose metabolic genes XYL1 and XYL2 by the HXT7 promoter resulted in massive accumulation of the xylose metabolic byproduct xylitol. Through the HXT7-driven expression of a reported redox variant, XYL1-K270R, along with optimized expression of XYL2 and the downstream pentose phosphate pathway genes, a balanced xylose metabolism toward ethanol formation was achieved. Fermented in a culture medium containing 50 g/L xylose as the sole carbon source, xylose is nearly consumed, with less than 3 g/L xylitol, and more than 16 g/L ethanol production. Hence, the combination of an inducible promoter and redox balance of the xylose utilization pathway is an attractive approach to optimizing fuel production from lignocellulose.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; expression; promoter; xylitol; xylose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Fermentation results with E6, E7, E8, and E9 engineered strains in a YPX medium containing 50 g/L xylose. Samples were taken at different time points, and fermentation data were obtained through HPLC analysis. Time-dependent (A) xylose consumption; (B) ethanol production; and (C) xylitol accumulation. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effects of XYL1 expression driven by different promoters on the xylose fermentation. (A–D) Fermentation results of strains E9T1 (A), E9F1 (B), E9H1 (C), and E9 (D) in a YPX medium with 50 g/L xylose are shown. (E) Comparison of relative transcription levels of XYL1 and XYL2 for strains E9, E9F1, E9T1, and E9H1. (F,G) Fermentation results of D9H1 (F) and D9 (G) in the YPX medium with 50 g/L xylose. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Glucose and xylose metabolic pathways along with key genes and enzymes involved. Abbreviations of related genes: TAL1, Transaldolase; TKL1, Transketolase; RPE1, Ribulose 5-phosphate epimerase; RKI1, Ribose 5-phosphate isomerase; PYK1, Pyruvate kinase; G-6-P, Glucose-6-phosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; Ga-3P, 3-phosphoglyceraldehyde; PEP, Phosphoenolpyruvate; and PYR, Pyruvate.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Improvement of xylose fermentation efficiency by altered expression of XYL2 and key genes in PPP. (A,B) Fermentation results of E9H1B8 (A) and E9H1H2B8 (B) in a YPX medium containing 50 g/L xylose. (C) Comparison of relative transcription levels of XYL1 and XYL2 in strains E9H1B8 and E9H1H2B8. (D) The fermentation performance of D9H1H2B8 was evaluated in a YPX medium containing 50 g/L xylose. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Expression levels of XYL1 and XYL2 driven by the HXT7 promoter under different fermentation conditions. (A) Comparison of transcription levels of XYL1 and XYL2 in strains E9, E9H1B8, and E9H1H2B8 in a YPX medium containing 20 g/L glucose to logarithmic growth phase. (B,C) Comparison of transcription levels of XYL1 (B) and XYL2 (C) for the indicated strains in a YPX medium containing 10 g/L xylose and 10 g/L glucose to logarithmic growth phase. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alam M. A., Yuan T., Wenlong X., Zhang B., Xu J. (2019). Process optimization for the production of high-concentration ethanol with Scenedesmus raciborskii biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 294:122219. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122219 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baghel R. S., Trivedi N., Gupta V., Neori A., Reddy C. R. K., Lali A., et al. (2015). Biorefining of marine macroalgal biomass for production of biofuel and commodity chemicals. Green Chem. 17 2436–2443. 10.1039/c4gc02532f - DOI
    1. Bao X., Gao D., Qu Y., Wang Z., Walfridssion M., Hahnhagerbal B. (1997). Effect on product formation in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing different levels of xylose metabolic genes. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 13:225. - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson O., Hahn-Hägerdal B., Gorwa-Grauslund M. F. (2009). Xylose reductase from Pichia stipitis with altered coenzyme preference improves ethanolic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2:9. 10.1186/1754-6834-2-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brat D., Boles E., Wiedemann B. (2009). Functional expression of a bacterial xylose isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 2304–2311. 10.1128/aem.02522-08 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources