Comparative Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Between Arthroplasty and Nonarthroplasty Fellowship Trained Surgeons
- PMID: 33718554
- PMCID: PMC7921708
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.01.007
Comparative Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Between Arthroplasty and Nonarthroplasty Fellowship Trained Surgeons
Abstract
Background: An adult reconstruction (AR) fellowship is designed to provide advanced training for a broad range of primary reconstructive and complex knee revision surgeries. This study aims to identify outcome differences between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons and non-AR (NAR) fellowship-trained surgeons.
Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 7415 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2016 to 2020. Two cohorts were established based on whether the operation was performed by an AR or NAR fellowship-trained surgeon. Demographic, clinical data, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at various time-points (preoperatively, 3 months, 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Primary outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.
Results: AR surgeons performed 5194 (70%) cases while NAR surgeons performed 2221 (30%) cases. Surgical time (minutes) significantly differed between the 2 groups (101.26 vs 111.56; P < .001). Length of stay, 90-day all-cause readmissions, revisions, and all-cause emergency department visits did not statistically differ (P = .079, P = .978, P = .094, and P = .241, respectively). AR surgeons were more likely to discharge their patients home than NAR surgeons (P = .001). NAR group reported lower KOOS, JR scores at 3 months and 1 year (preop: 45.30 vs 45.79, P = .728; 3 months: 64.73 vs 59.47, P < .001; 1 year: 71.66 vs 69.56, P = .234); however, only 3-month scores statistically differed. Veterans RAND-12 Physical and Mental components scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS) were not statistically significant at any time-point between the cohorts. Delta-improvements preoperatively to 1 year in KOOS, JR (26.36 vs 23.77; P < .001) and VR-12 PCS (11.98 vs 10.62; P < .001) scores were significantly higher for the AR cohort but did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates significantly shorter surgical times and greater improvements in KOOS, JR and VR-12 PCS scores associated with TKAs performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons.
Level iii evidence: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Keywords: Adult reconstruction fellowship; Arthroplasty fellowship; Clinical outcomes; Patient reported outcome measures; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2021 The Authors.
References
-
- Jüni P., Reichenbach S., Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:721. - PubMed
-
- Sloan M., Premkumar A., Sheth N.P. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the u.s., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:1455. - PubMed
-
- Siddiqi A., White P.B., Mistry J.B. Effect of bundled payments and health care reform as alternative payment models in total joint arthroplasty: a clinical review. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2590. - PubMed
-
- Iorio R., Bosco J., Slover J., Sayeed Y., Zuckerman J.D. Single institution early experience with the bundled payments for care improvement initiative. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:e2. - PubMed
-
- Butler B.A., Lawton C.D., Johnson D.J., Nicolay R.W., Yamaguchi J.T., Stover M.D. The experiential benefit of an orthopedic trauma fellowship: an analysis of ACGME case log data from 2006 to 2017. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:1556. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
