Reducing Pediatric ED Length of Stay by Reducing Diagnostic Testing: A Discrete Event Simulation Model
- PMID: 33718751
- PMCID: PMC7952107
- DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000396
Reducing Pediatric ED Length of Stay by Reducing Diagnostic Testing: A Discrete Event Simulation Model
Abstract
Quality improvement efforts can require significant investment before the system impact of those efforts can be evaluated. We used discrete event simulation (DES) modeling to test the theoretical impact of a proposed initiative to reduce diagnostic testing for low-acuity pediatric emergency department (ED) patients.
Methods: We modified an existing DES model, built at another large, urban, academic pediatric ED, to forecast the impact of reducing diagnostic testing rates on mean ED length of stay (LOS). The modified model included local testing rates for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 4 and 5 patients and additional processes defined by local experts. Validation was performed by comparing model output predictions of mean LOS and wait times to actual site-specific data. We determined the goal reduction in diagnostic testing rates using the Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology. Model output mean LOS and wait times, with testing set at benchmark rates, were compared to outputs with testing set at current levels.
Results: During validation testing, model output metrics approximated actual clinical data with no statistically significant differences. Compared to model outputs with current testing rates, the mean LOS with testing set at an achievable benchmark was significantly shorter for ESI 4 (difference 19.1 mins [95% confidence interval 12.2, 26.0]) patients.
Conclusion: A DES model predicted a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS for ESI 4 pediatric ED patients if diagnostic testing is performed at an achievable benchmark rate compared to current rates. DES shows promise as a tool to evaluate the impact of a QI initiative before implementation.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Discrete event simulation modelling to evaluate the impact of a quality improvement initiative on patient flow in a paediatric emergency department.Emerg Med J. 2020 Apr;37(4):193-199. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208667. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Emerg Med J. 2020. PMID: 31915264
-
Impact of Universal Suicide Risk Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Discrete Event Simulation Approach.Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Jan;28(1):25-34. doi: 10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.25. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Healthc Inform Res. 2022. PMID: 35172088 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of medical trainees on pediatric emergency department flow: a discrete event simulation modeling study.Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;20(11):1112-20. doi: 10.1111/acem.12252. Acad Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 24238313
-
Decreasing length of stay in the emergency department with a split emergency severity index 3 patient flow model.Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;20(11):1171-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12249. Acad Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 24238321
-
Temporal Trends and Predictors of Thirty-Day Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ontario Between 2003 and 2016.J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 14. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 31732370 Review.
Cited by
-
Key performance indicators in emergency department simulation: a scoping review.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 30;33(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01318-7. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39885519 Free PMC article.
-
Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212262. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34832016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Under-triage: A New Trigger to Drive Quality Improvement in the Emergency Department.Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Aug 1;7(4):e581. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000581. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022. PMID: 35928021 Free PMC article.
-
Let us to the TWISST; Plan, Simulate, Study and Act.Pediatr Qual Saf. 2023 Jul 10;8(4):e664. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000664. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2023. PMID: 37434590 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McCarthy ML, Ding R, Pines JM, et al. . Provider variation in fast track treatment time. Med Care. 2012; 50:43–49 - PubMed
-
- Byczkowski TL, Fitzgerald M, Kennebeck S, et al. . A comprehensive view of parental satisfaction with pediatric emergency department visits. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62:340–350 - PubMed
-
- Crane J, Noon C. The Definitive Guide to Emergency Department Operational Improvement: Employing Lean Principles with Current ED Best Practices to Create the “No Wait” Department. 2011, 1st. New York, NY: Productivity Press
-
- Powell EC, Hampers LC. Physician variation in test ordering in the management of gastroenteritis in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157:978–983 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources