Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;49(1):3-10.
doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2020.70. Epub 2020 May 5.

Vasopressors for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Spinal Induced Hypotension during Caesarean Section

Affiliations
Review

Vasopressors for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Spinal Induced Hypotension during Caesarean Section

Ebru Biricik et al. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Vasopressors have currently become the mainstay therapy for the management of spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) as the major mechanism of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia is the loss of arteriolar tone produced by sympathetic block. Vasopressors for the prophylaxis and treatment of SIH have been the subject of a significant amount of research, yet remain an attractive and important clinical problem. This review will highlight controversies and recent research on the use of vasopressors for both prophylaxis and treatment of SIH. For decades, ephedrine was considered to be the best vasopressor for the management of maternal hypotension. However, its use has been reported to be associated with a 5-fold increased risk of foetal acidosis than phenylephrine. At present, phenylephrine is the vasopressor of choice for preventing and treating SIH at caesarean section. However, its use is often associated with a decreased heart rate and low cardiac output state owing to the lack of β-mimetic activity. Norepinephrine has been introduced as an alternative vasopressor for preventing and treating SIH because of its additional β-mimetic activity. However before its routine clinical use, a further series of studies are needed to establish its efficacy and safety for both the mother and foetus.

Keywords: Cesarean section; spinal induced hypotension; vasopressors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:636–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habib AS. A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:377–90. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182373a3e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlgren G, Granath F, Pregner K, Roesbald PG, Wessel H, Irestedt L. Colloid vs. crystalloid preload to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1200–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00730.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1592–8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e016d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klöhr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:909–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02239.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources