Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 14;23(4):42.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01027-9.

Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients

Sophie Lelorain  1
Affiliations
Review

Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients

Sophie Lelorain. Curr Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Our goal was to provide healthcare professionals (HCPs) with evidence-based data about what can be done to handle prognostic discussions with empathy.

Recent findings: First, disclosing prognosis involves a good reason to do so and making sure that the patient will be able to process the discussion. Second, communication tips are given for the three dimensions of empathy: "establishing rapport with the patient," which should not be overlooked; the emotional dimension, which involves an accurate understanding of the patient and communication skills; and the "active/positive" dimension which is about giving hope, explaining things clearly and helping patients take control with shared decision-making and a planned future. Although communication tips are helpful, empathy training should be based more on the development of HCPs' emotional skills, in order to help them regulate their emotions and thus be more comfortable with those of patients and families. Furthermore, research into empathy toward minorities and relatives is needed.

Keywords: Bad news; Cancer care; Communication; Emotional skills; Empathy; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Mack JW, Fasciano KM, Block SD. Communication about prognosis with adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: information needs, prognostic awareness, and outcomes of disclosure. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(18):1861–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.2128 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lippe M, Farya P, Jennifer M, Stanley A, Barbara J, Boone G. Communicating oncologic prognosis with empathy: a pilot study of a novel communication guide. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2020;37(12):1029–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909120921834 . - DOI
    1. Geerse OP, Lamas DJ, Sanders JJ, Paladino J, Kavanagh J, Henrich NJ, et al. A qualitative study of serious illness conversations in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(7):773–81. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0487 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Studer RK, Danuser B, Gomez P. Physicians’ psychophysiological stress reaction in medical communication of bad news: a critical literature review. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017;120:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.06.006 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habib AR, Cronin AM, Earle CC, Tulsky JA, Mack JW, Abel GA, et al. How do blood cancer doctors discuss prognosis? Findings from a National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(6):677–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0441 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources