Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of achalasia
- PMID: 33720448
- PMCID: PMC9380030
- DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14118
Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of achalasia
Abstract
Background: The management of achalasia has improved due to diagnostic and therapeutic innovations. However, variability in care delivery remains and no established measures defining quality of care for this population exist. We aimed to use formal methodology to establish quality indicators for achalasia patients.
Methods: Quality indicator concepts were identified from the literature, consensus guidelines and clinical experts. Using RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, experts in achalasia independently ranked proposed concepts in a two-round modified Delphi process based on 1) importance, 2) scientific acceptability, 3) usability, and 4) feasibility. Highly valid measures required strict agreement (≧ 80% of panelists) in the range of 7-9 for across all four categories.
Key results: There were 17 experts who rated 26 proposed quality indicator topics. In round one, 2 (8%) quality measures were rated valid. In round two, 19 measures were modified based on panel suggestions, and experts rated 10 (53%) of these measures as valid, resulting in a total of 12 quality indicators. Two measures pertained to patient education and five to diagnosis, including discussing treatment options with risk and benefits and using the most recent version of the Chicago Classification to define achalasia phenotypes, respectively. Other indicators pertained to treatment options, such as the use of botulinum toxin for those not considered surgical candidates and management of reflux following achalasia treatment.
Conclusions & inferences: Using a robust methodology, achalasia quality indicators were identified, which can form the basis for establishing quality gaps and generating fully specified quality measures.
Keywords: achalasia; clinical practice; esophageal dysphagia; esophageal motility; quality indicators.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Afrin N. Kamal: None, Priya Kathpalia: None, Fouad Otaki: None, Albert J Bredenoord: Received speaker and/or consulting fees from Laborie, Diversatek, Medtronic, Donald O. Castell: None reported, John O. Clarke: Consultant for Isothrive, Medtronic, Pfizer, Regeneron/Sanofi; site principal investigator for Ironwood, Impleo Medical, Gary W. Falk: None, Ronnie Fass: Advisor – Medtronic, Speaker – Diversitek, C. Prakash Gyawali: Consulting: Medtronic, Diversatek, Ironwood, Isothrive, Quintiles, Peter J Kahrilas: Consultant/Advisory Boards: Reckitt Benckiser [Reflux disease (Aluminum hydroxide/magnesium carbonate)]; Ironwood [Irritable bowel (Linaclotide)], Philip O. Katz: None, David A. Katzka: Education consulting for Shire and Takeda, Roberto Penagini: None, John E. Pandolfino: Crospon [IP], Medtronic [Speaking, Consulting, Licensing, Grant], Diversatek [Speaking/Consulting/Grant], Takeda [Consulting]. Ironwood [Consulting, Grant], Sabine Roman: Consulting Medtronic, Research support: Medtronic, Diverstak Healthcare, Joel E. Richter: None, Edoardo Savarino: Consultant: Abbvie, Allergan, MSD, Takeda, Sofar, and Janssen, Teaching and speaking: Medtronic, Reckitt-Benckiser, Malesci, and Zambon, George Triadafilopoulos: None, Michael F. Vaezi: Research support Diversatek; Consulting Pathom, Marcelo F. Vela: Medtronic (consulting), Diversatek (research support), Fouad Otaki: None, David A. Leiman: Chair-elect of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Quality Committee (QC). The current manuscript reflects individual work not completed on behalf, or with the endorsement of, the AGA or the QC, which would evaluate any indicators independently. Education consultant, Medtronic.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Quality Indicator Development for the Approach to Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Modified Delphi Study.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov-Dec 01;58(10):975-980. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001963. Epub 2024 Jan 15. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38227852 Free PMC article.
-
Achalasia Quality Indicator Adherence.Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Feb;68(2):389-395. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07658-7. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Dig Dis Sci. 2023. PMID: 36459295
-
Best Practices in Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Multidisciplinary Modified Delphi Study.Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1125-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07672-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22. Dig Dis Sci. 2023. PMID: 35995882
-
The Pathogenesis and Management of Achalasia: Current Status and Future Directions.Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):449-63. doi: 10.5009/gnl14446. Gut Liver. 2015. PMID: 26087861 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Whose patient is it? The path to multidisciplinary management of achalasia.J Surg Res. 2018 Aug;228:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.047. Epub 2018 Mar 21. J Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29907234 Review.
Cited by
-
Narrowing the Quality Chasm in Achalasia.Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Feb;68(2):341-343. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07662-x. Epub 2022 Oct 15. Dig Dis Sci. 2023. PMID: 36242687 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Quality Indicator Development for the Approach to Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Modified Delphi Study.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov-Dec 01;58(10):975-980. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001963. Epub 2024 Jan 15. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38227852 Free PMC article.
-
Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251345340. doi: 10.1177/17562848251345340. eCollection 2025. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40583968 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaire.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov;56(10):1434-1443. doi: 10.1111/apt.17230. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 36127750 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;24(3):269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022. PMID: 36778081 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Harvey PR, Thomas T, Chandan JS, et al. Incidence, morbidity and mortality of patients with achalasia in England: findings from a study of nationwide hospital and primary care data. Gut. 2019;68(5):790–795. - PubMed
-
- Boeckxstaens GE. Revisiting Epidemiologic Features of Achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):374–375. - PubMed
-
- Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, et al. High-resolution manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(3):372–380. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical