Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;26(1):1899643.
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1899643.

Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting

Affiliations

Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting

Otasowie M Odiase et al. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the impact and experience of radiation oncology (RO) education in the undergraduate medical experience in the USA. A list of American medical schools was complied from various sources including the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) in the summer of 2019. Data was extracted through institution website review, individual phone calls and email distribution. A total of 198 programs (155 allopathic and 43 osteopathic medical schools) were included. Every medical school curriculum had oncology lecture during MS year 1 and 2, although a minimal amount (4%) had a RO-specific lecture during MS year 1 and 2. There were significant differences in the RO education and experience in allopathic (MD) versus osteopathic (DO) programs. Home radiation oncology programs and career advising were associated with a radiation oncology elective during year 3 and 4. Furthermore, RO career advisors and older schools were associated with having one student match into radiation oncology. RO education during the didactic portion of the undergraduate medical experience remains extremely limited. This limitation is even more pronounced in medical schools without RO mentorship and in osteopathic medical schools. This lack of RO exposure perpetuates itself by bringing less students into the field. These issues require attention both on a national and medical-school-specific level.

Keywords: Radiation oncology; education; undergraduate medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

    1. Cancer statistics. [cited 2020 September6]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics
    1. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, et al. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:193–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirsch AE, Singh D, Ozonoff A, et al. Educating medical students about radiation oncology: initial results of the oncology education initiative. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:711–715. - PubMed
    1. Neeley BC, Golden DW, Brower JV, et al. Student perspectives on oncology curricula at USA medical schools. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34:56–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Koottappillil B, Shah B, et al. Medical student-reported outcomes of a radiation oncologist-led preclinical course in oncology: a five-year analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:735–739. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources