Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248638.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248638. eCollection 2021.

The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes

Affiliations

The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children's socioeconomic outcomes

Gábor Hajdu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We examine the long-term consequences of restricted access to abortion following a change in the Hungarian abortion law in 1974. Due to a change that restricted access to legal abortions, the number of induced abortions decreased from 169,650 to 102,022 between 1973 and 1974, whereas the number of live births increased from 156,224 to 186,288. We analyze the effects on the adult outcomes of the affected cohort of newborns (educational attainment, labor market participation, teen fertility). We use matched large-scale, individual-level administrative datasets of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (population census 2011; live birth register), and we estimate the effects by comparing children born within a short timespan around the time the law change came into effect. We apply a difference-in-differences approach, building on the special rules of the new law that, despite the severe restriction, still made abortion permissible for selected groups of women. We control for the compositional change in the population of parents, rule out the effect of (unobserved) time trends and other potential behavioral responses to the law change, and draw causal inferences. We find that restricted access to abortion had, on average, a negative impact on the socioeconomic outcomes of the affected cohort of children. Children born after the law change have had worse educational outcomes, a greater likelihood of being unemployed at age 37, and a higher probability of being a teen parent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Number of induced abortions and live births between 1964 and 1980.
Source: Hungarian Central Statistical Office (http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xstadat/xstadat_long/h_wdsd001a.html and http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xstadat/xstadat_long/h_wdsd001b.html).
Fig 2
Fig 2. The difference between the number of births among mothers under age 35 and mothers over age 35.
The graph shows quarterly values. The solid line shows the difference in the number of births. The dashed line shows the predicted values based on a linear OLS regression using data between 1972/1 and 1974/2. Difference: number of births among mothers under age 35 − number of births among mothers over age 35. Mothers under age 35 at the time of conception were 33.88–35.38 years old when giving birth; mothers over 35 at the time of conception were 35.77–37.27 years old when giving birth.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ananat EO, Gruber J, Levine PB. Abortion Legalization and Life-Cycle Fertility. J Hum Resour. 2007;XLII: 375–397. 10.3368/jhr.XLII.2.375 - DOI
    1. Antón J-I, Ferre Z, Triunfo P. The impact of the legalisation of abortion on birth outcomes in Uruguay. Health Econ. 2018;27: 1103–1119. 10.1002/hec.3659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guldi M. Fertility effects of abortion and birth control pill access for minors. Demography. 2008;45: 817–827. 10.1353/dem.0.0026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levine PB, Staiger D, Kane TJ, Zimmerman DJ. Roe v Wade and American fertility. Am J Public Health. 1999;89: 199–203. 10.2105/ajph.89.2.199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levine PB, Staiger D. Abortion Policy and Fertility Outcomes: The Eastern European Experience. J Law Econ. 2004;47: 223–243. 10.1086/380475 - DOI

Publication types