Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;28(11):6696-6704.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09744-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Resection in Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer: A Subset Analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 Study

Affiliations

Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Resection in Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer: A Subset Analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 Study

Linn Woelber et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: As the population at risk for pelvic nodal involvement remains poorly described, the role of pelvic lymphadenectomy (LAE) in vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC) has been a matter of discussion for decades.

Methods: In the AGO-CaRE-1 study, 1618 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB or higher primary VSCC treated at 29 centers in Germany between 1998 and 2008 were documented. In this analysis, only patients with pelvic LAE (n = 70) were analyzed with regard to prognosis and correlation between inguinal and pelvic lymph node involvement.

Results: The majority of patients had T1b/T2 tumors (n = 47; 67.1%), with a median diameter of 40 mm (2-240 mm); 54/70 patients (77.1%) who received pelvic LAE had positive groin nodes. For 42 of these 54 patients, the number of affected groin nodes had been documented as a median of 3; 14/42 (33.3%) of these patients had histologically confirmed pelvic nodal metastases (median number of affected pelvic nodes 3 [1-12]). In these 14 patients, the median number of affected groin nodes was 7 (1-30), with a groin metastases median maximum diameter of 42.5 mm (12-50). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.85, with 83.3% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity for the prediction of pelvic involvement in cases of six or more positive groin nodes. No cases of pelvic nodal involvement without groin metastases were observed. Prognosis in cases of pelvic metastasis was poor, with a median progression-free survival of only 12.5 months.

Conclusion: For the majority of node-positive patients with VSCC, pelvic nodal staging appears unnecessary since a relevant risk for pelvic nodal involvement only seems to be present in highly node-positive disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prediction of pelvic involvement depending on the number of inguinally affected lymph nodes. ROC receiver operating characteristic
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Progression-free survival and overall survival with regard to pelvic lymph node status

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer - Does it make sense?
    Woelber L, Bommert M, Prieske K, Fischer I, Zu Eulenburg C, Vettorazzi E, Harter P, Jueckstock J, Hilpert F, de Gregorio N, Iborra S, Sehouli J, Ignatov A, Hillemanns P, Fuerst S, Strauss HG, Baumann K, Beckmann M, Mustea A, Meier W, Wimberger P, Hanker L, Canzler U, Fehm T, Luyten A, Hellriegel M, Kosse J, Heiss C, Hantschmann P, Mallmann P, Tanner B, Pfisterer J, Mahner S, Schmalfeldt B, Jaeger A. Woelber L, et al. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020 Dec;80(12):1221-1228. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-0138. Epub 2020 Dec 3. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020. PMID: 33293730 Free PMC article.
  • Risk for Pelvic Metastasis and Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Positive Vulvar Cancer-Results from the AGO-VOP.2 QS Vulva Study.
    Woelber L, Hampl M, Eulenburg CZ, Prieske K, Hambrecht J, Fuerst S, Klapdor R, Heublein S, Gass P, Rohner A, Canzler U, Becker S, Bommert M, Bauerschlag D, Denecke A, Hanker L, Runnebaumn I, Forner DM, Schochter F, Klar M, Schwab R, Koepke M, Kalder M, Hantschmann P, Ratiu D, Denschlag D, Schroeder W, Tuschy B, Baumann K, Mustea A, Soergel P, Bronger H, Bauerschmitz G, Kosse J, Koch MC, Ignatov A, Sehouli J, Dannecker C, Mahner S, Jaeger A. Woelber L, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;14(2):418. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020418. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35053582 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Boyce J, Fruchter RG, Kasambilides E, Nicastri AD, Sedlis A, Remy JC. Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;20(3):364–377. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(85)90218-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hacker NF, van der Velden J. Conservative management of early vulvar cancer. Cancer. 1993;71(4 Suppl):1673–1677. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820710436. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klemm P, Marnitz S, Köhler C, Braig U, Schneider A. Clinical implication of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer and positive groin nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(1):101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Velden J, van Lindert AC, Lammes FB. Extracapsular growth of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. The impact on recurrence and survival. Cancer. 1995;75(12):2885–2890. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2885::AID-CNCR2820751215>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis A, Adcock L. Radiation therapy versus pelvic node resection for carcinoma of the vulva with positive groin nodes. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(6):733–740. - PubMed