Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Mar;17(3):282-290.
doi: 10.1177/17474930211006302. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Cost-effectiveness of an enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment (PASTA) during emergency stroke care: Economic results from a pragmatic cluster randomized trial

Nawaraj Bhattarai  1 , Christopher I Price  2 , Peter McMeekin  3 , Mehdi Javanbakht  1 , Luke Vale  1 , Gary A Ford  2   4 , Lisa Shaw  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of an enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment (PASTA) during emergency stroke care: Economic results from a pragmatic cluster randomized trial

Nawaraj Bhattarai et al. Int J Stroke. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment (PASTA) trial evaluated an enhanced emergency care pathway which aimed to facilitate thrombolysis in hospital. A pre-planned health economic evaluation was included. The main results showed no statistical evidence of a difference in either thrombolysis volume (primary outcome) or 90-day dependency. However, counter-intuitive findings were observed with the intervention group showing fewer thrombolysis treatments but less dependency.

Aims: Cost-effectiveness of the PASTA intervention was examined relative to standard care.

Methods: A within trial cost-utility analysis estimated mean costs and quality-adjusted life years over 90 days' time horizon. Costs were derived from resource utilization data for individual trial participants. Quality-adjusted life years were calculated by mapping modified Rankin scale scores to EQ-5D-3L utility tariffs. A post-hoc subgroup analysis examined cost-effectiveness when trial hospitals were divided into compliant and non-compliant with recommendations for a stroke specialist thrombolysis rota.

Results: The trial enrolled 1214 patients: 500 PASTA and 714 standard care. There was no evidence of a quality-adjusted life year difference between groups [0·007 (95% CI: -0·003 to 0·018)] but costs were lower in the PASTA group [-£1473 (95% CI: -£2736 to -£219)]. There was over 97.5% chance that the PASTA pathway would be considered cost-effective. There was no evidence of a difference in costs at seven thrombolysis rota compliant hospitals but costs at eight non-complaint hospitals costs were lower in PASTA with more dominant cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: Analyses indicate that the PASTA pathway may be considered cost-effective, particularly if deployed in areas where stroke specialist availability is limited.Trial Registration: ISRCTN12418919 www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12418919.

Keywords: Stroke; ambulance; cluster randomized controlled trial; cost-effectiveness; paramedic; thrombolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The employing institutions of all authors received funds from NIHR for this work to be undertaken. MJ received consultancy fees for economic modelling work. CP and LS received nonfinancial support from Cerebrotech Medical Systems Inc and grants from Innovate UK.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cost-effectiveness plane—base case analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cost effectiveness acceptability curve—base case analysis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cost-effectiveness plane: compliant hospitals.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cost-effectiveness plane: non-compliant hospitals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E and Del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; CD000213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. School of Population Health and Environmental Studies King’s College London, https://www.strokeaudit.org.
    1. Hsieh MJ, Tang SC, Chiang WC, Tsai LK, Jeng JS, Ma MH. Effect of prehospital notification on acute stroke care: a multicenter study. Scand J Trauma, Resuscitation Emerg Med 2016; 24: 57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wojner-Alexandrov AW, Alexandrov AV, Rodriguez D, Persse D, Grotta JC. Houston paramedic and emergency stroke treatment and outcomes study (HoPSTO). Stroke 2005; 36: 1512–1518. - PubMed
    1. Berglund A, Svensson L, Sjostrand C, et al. Higher prehospital priority level of stroke improves thrombolysis frequency and time to stroke unit: The Hyper Acute STroke Alarm (HASTA) Study. Stroke 2012; 43: 2666–2670. - PubMed

Publication types