ISS is not an appropriate tool to estimate overtriage
- PMID: 33725158
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01637-9
ISS is not an appropriate tool to estimate overtriage
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this work is to study a cohort of patients of ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, and to determine the number of patients that ultimately benefited from the skills and resources specific of a level 1 trauma center.
Methods: Retrospective study from a prospective cohort of patients admitted to TC (Beaujon Hospital, APHP) for suspected severe trauma from January 2011 to December 2017. The main outcome criterion was the use of surgery or interventional radiology within the first 24 h after admission of patients with ISS < 15. The secondary outcomes were stratified into severe (mortality, resuscitation care, length of stay in intensive care units) and non-severe criteria (mild head injury, hospital discharge or transfer within 24 h).
Results: Of 3035 patients admitted during the study period, 1409 with an ISS < 15 were included, corresponding to a theoretical overtriage rate of 46.4%. Among these, 611 patients (43.4%) underwent emergency intervention within the first 24 h (586 surgical interventions, 19 direct transfers to the operating theater and 6 acts of interventional radiology), 238 (16.9%) of patients presented with severe and 531 (38%) with non-severe outcome criteria.
Conclusion: This work demonstrates that in a cohort of patients classified as ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, a considerable amount of TC-specific resources are required, and patients present with severe outcome criteria despite being classified as overtriaged. These results suggest that triage of trauma patients should be based on resource use and clinical outcome rather than anatomic criteria.
Keywords: Injury severity score; Organization; Overtriage; Traumatology.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Bardes JM, Inaba K, Schellenberg M, Grabo D, Strumwasser A, Matsushima K, Clark D, Brown N, Demetriades D. The contemporary timing of trauma deaths. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(6):893–9. - DOI
-
- Davis KA, Fabian TC, Cioffi WG. The toll of death and disability from traumatic injury in the United States-the “Neglected Disease” of modern society, still neglected after 50 years. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):221–2. - DOI
-
- Cassignol A, Markarian T, Cotte J, Marmin J, Nguyen C, Cardinale M, Pauly V, Kerbaul F, Meaudre E, Bobbia X. Evaluation and comparison of different prehospital triage scores of trauma patients on in-hospital mortality. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(4):543–50. - DOI
-
- Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Sullivent EE, Wald MM, Mitchko J, Jurkovich GJ, Henry MC, Salomone JP, Wang SC, Galli RL, National Expert Panel on Field Triage, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58(RR-1):1–35. - PubMed
-
- MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, Salkever DS, Scharfstein DO. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–78. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical