Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning
- PMID: 33725333
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02812-6
Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the functioning of the PROMIS-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) across clinical setting, patient age, and medical complexity by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) within the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) domains. To our knowledge, no study demonstrates lack of differential item functioning (DIF) for PROMIS-GH across these populations. We hypothesize that the PROMIS-GH domains of GMH and GPH will perform similarly when compared across these populations.
Methods: Seven thousand nine hundred and seventy four complete PROMIS Global Health measures were retrospectively analyzed using the 'Lordif' package on the R platform. DIF was investigated for both GMH and GPH across clinical environment (Orthopedic Surgery, Family Medicine, & Internal Medicine), age group (≤ 53, > 53-66, > 66), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI:0, CCI:1, CCI:2 +) using quasi Monte Carlo estimation. To assess the significance of DIF, Wald tests were used with the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure.
Results: No items contained in the GMH or GPH demonstrated DIF across age groups, medical complexity, or clinical environment.
Conclusion: Items assessing the domains of GMH and GPH within the PROMIS-GH function comparably across treatment setting, age category, and medical comorbidities. The PROMIS-Global Health holds potential to facilitate interdisciplinary patient care and patient optimization prior to surgical intervention.
Keywords: Differential item functioning; Hip or knee osteoarthritis; Interdisciplinary care; PROMIS; Patient reported outcomes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
References
-
- Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Lyman, S., & Hidaka, C. (2016). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures-What Data Do We Really Need? Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(6), 1144–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.073 - DOI
-
- Lapin, B. R., Thompson, N. R., Schuster, A., & Katzan, I. L. (2019). Patient versus proxy response on global health scales: no meaningful DIFference. Quality of Life Research, 28(6), 1585–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02130-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hays, R. D., Calderon, J. L., Spritzer, K. L., Reise, S. P., & Paz, S. H. (2018). Differential item functioning by language on the PROMIS((R)) physical functioning items for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 27(1), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1691-5 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources