Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24828.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024828.

Male sperm quality and risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion in Chinese couples: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Male sperm quality and risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion in Chinese couples: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jinqi Li et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association of conventional semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation with risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patients: Total 1,690 male partners of women with RSA, and 1,337 male partners of fertile control women.

Interventions: Case-control or cohort studies were determined by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Libraries, China Biology Medicine disc, Chinese Scientific Journals Fulltext Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. RSA was defined as two or more previous pregnancy losses. The fertile women refer to the reproductive women who have had at least a normal pregnancy history and no history of abortion.

Main outcome measures: This study included eight outcome measures: semen volume(ml), semen pH value, sperm density(106/ml), sperm viability (%), sperm progressive motility rate (%), normal sperm morphology rate (%), sperm deformity rate(%), sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) (%). The summary measures were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Finally, twenty-four studies were included for analysis. Overall, male partners of women with RSA had a significantly lower level of sperm density (SMD = -0.53, 95%CI: - 0.75 to -0.30), sperm viability (SMD = -1.03, 95%CI: - 1.52 to -0.54), sperm progressive motility rate (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI:-1.06 - -0.46), and normal sperm morphology rate (SMD = -0.56, 95%CI: - 0.99 to -0.12), and had a significantly higher rate of sperm deformity rate (SMD = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.60 - 1.97), and sperm DFI (SMD = 1.60, 95%CI: 1.04 to 2.17), when compared with the reference group. However, there were no statistically significant differences for semen volume (SMD = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.14 - 0.08) and semen pH value (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.05) among 2 groups.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis support an association of sperm density, sperm viability, sperm progressive motility rate, normal sperm morphology rate, sperm deformity rate, as well as sperm DFI with RSA. However, given the significant heterogeneity between studies and the lack of more detailed data on the subjects, further large-scale prospective studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study identification and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Semen volume and pH value and risk of RSA (A, semen volume; B, pH value).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis chart for semen volume, pH value, density and viability (A, semen volume; B, semen pH value; C, sperm density; D, sperm viability).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sensitivity analysis chart for the remaining four indicators. (A, sperm progressive motility rate; B, normal sperm morphology rate; C, sperm deformity rate; D, sperm DFI).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel chart (A, semen volume; B, semen pH value; C, sperm density; D, sperm viability; E, sperm progressive motility rate; F, normal sperm morphology rate; G, sperm deformity rate; H, sperm DFI).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee, opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1103–11. - PubMed
    1. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB, et al. . Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod 2015;30:495–8. - PubMed
    1. Huang M. Etiological analysis and treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Journal of Practical Gynecologic Endocrinology 2017;4:101–2.
    1. Imam SN, Shamsi MB, Kumar K, et al. . Idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: role of paternal factors; a pilot study. J Reprod Infertil 2011;12:267–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellver J, Meseguer M, Muriel L, et al. . Y chromosome microdeletions, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm oxidative stress as causes of recurrent spontaneous abortion of unknown etiology. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1713–21. - PubMed