Influence of agents and mechanisms of injury on anatomical burn locations in children <5 years old with a scald
- PMID: 33727239
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320710
Influence of agents and mechanisms of injury on anatomical burn locations in children <5 years old with a scald
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate how the mechanism and agent of injury can influence the anatomical location of a scald.
Design: Prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.
Setting: 20 hospital sites across England and Wales including emergency departments, minor injury units and regional burns units.
Patients: Children aged 5 years and younger who attended hospital with a scald.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: a descriptive analysis of the mechanism, agent and anatomical location of accidental scalds. Secondary outcome: a comparison of these factors between children with and without child protection (CP) referral.
Results: Of 1041 cases of accidental scalds, the most common narrative leading to this injury was a cup or mug of hot beverage being pulled down and scalding the head or trunk (132/1041; 32.9% of cases). Accidental scalds in baths/showers were rare (1.4% of cases). Accidental immersion injuries were mainly distributed on hands and feet (76.7%). There were differences in the presentation between children with accidental scalds and the 103 who were referred for CP assessment; children with scalds caused by hot water in baths/showers were more likely to get referred for CP assessment (p<0.0001), as were those with symmetrically distributed (p<0.0001) and unwitnessed (p=0.007) scalds.
Conclusions: An understanding of the distributions of scalds and its relationship to different mechanisms of injury and causative agents will help clinicians assess scalds in young children, particularly those new to the emergency department who may be unfamiliar with expected scald patterns or with the importance of using appropriate terminology when describing scalds.
Keywords: child abuse; epidemiology.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Contact burns: the influence of agents and mechanisms of injury on anatomical burn locations in children <5 years old and associations with child protection referrals.Arch Dis Child. 2020 Jun;105(6):580-586. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318140. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Arch Dis Child. 2020. PMID: 31871044
-
Patterns of burns and scalds in children.Arch Dis Child. 2014 Apr;99(4):316-21. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304991. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Arch Dis Child. 2014. PMID: 24492796
-
Hot tea and tiny tots don't mix: A cross-sectional survey on hot beverage scalds.Burns. 2017 Dec;43(8):1809-1816. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Burns. 2017. PMID: 28606747
-
Incidence and characteristics of non-accidental burns in children: A systematic review.Burns. 2020 Sep;46(6):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Burns. 2020. PMID: 32057545
-
Toxic shock syndrome in paediatric thermal injuries: A case series and systematic literature review.Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Burns. 2018. PMID: 28867411
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous