Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):5993.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85259-6.

Detection of horizontal gene transfer in the genome of the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta

Affiliations

Detection of horizontal gene transfer in the genome of the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta

Danielle M Matriano et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT), the movement of heritable materials between distantly related organisms, is crucial in eukaryotic evolution. However, the scale of HGT in choanoflagellates, the closest unicellular relatives of metazoans, and its possible roles in the evolution of animal multicellularity remains unexplored. We identified at least 175 candidate HGTs in the genome of the colonial choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta using sequence-based tests. The majority of these were orthologous to genes in bacterial and microalgal lineages, yet displayed genomic features consistent with the rest of the S. rosetta genome-evidence of ancient acquisition events. Putative functions include enzymes involved in amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, cell signaling, and the synthesis of extracellular matrix components. Functions of candidate HGTs may have contributed to the ability of choanoflagellates to assimilate novel metabolites, thereby supporting adaptation, survival in diverse ecological niches, and response to external cues that are possibly critical in the evolution of multicellularity in choanoflagellates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HGT candidates in the S. rosetta genome. (A) Taxonomic affiliation of all S. rosetta genes and genes that passed the Alien Index analysis (AI45). (B) Number of putative HGTs detected based on taxonomic affiliation (taxon filter) and Alien Index (AI45) analysis. (C) Number of HGT candidates with orthologs in other eukaryotic lineages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gene architecture of candidate HGTs. Density plots showing the distribution of (A) coding sequence length, (B) GC content at the third codon position (GC3), (C) intron number, and (D) codon bias index in candidate horizontally transferred genes (red) in comparison to the bulk of S. rosetta genes (gray). (E) Number of HGT candidates that are expressed in the indicated life stages of S. rosetta. (F) Number of HGT candidates conserved in other choanoflagellate groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Potential donor phyla of candidate HGTs in S. rosetta. (A) Taxon affiliation of candidate HGTs based on the best sequence match for each gene. Phylogenetic analysis of selected candidate HGTs, including (B) calcium binding protein of microalgal origin, (C) glycosyltransferase of fungal origin, and (D) chondroitin sulfate lyase, (E) glycosyl hydrolase, and (F) diaminopimelate epimerase of prokaryotic origin. Genes from choanoflagellates are shown in red, fungi or opisthokonts in orange, microalgae in green, and prokaryotes in blue. S. rosetta genes are indicated by a red dot. Trees were generated using MrBayes 3.2.6. Circles at the branches indicate posterior probabilities of 0.70–1.00.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Functional analysis of candidate HGTs. (A) Most common PFAM protein domains in the set of candidate HGTs. (B) Gene ontology functions enriched in the set of putative HGTs. Enrichment p-values (p ≤ 0.05) for selected functions are shown. (C) Number of candidate HGTs with associated functions based on manual curation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment. Microbiol. Rev. 1994;58:563–602. doi: 10.1128/MR.58.3.563-602.1994. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dubnau D. DNA uptake in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1999;53:217–244. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen I, Dubnau D. DNA uptake during bacterial transformation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:241–249. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro844. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heinemann JA, Sprague GF. Bacterial conjugative plasmids mobilize DNA transfer between bacteria and yeast. Nature. 1989;340:205–209. doi: 10.1038/340205a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llosa M, Gomis-Rüth FX, Coll M, De la Cruz F. Bacterial conjugation: A two-step mechanism for DNA transport. Mol. Microbiol. 2002;45:1–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03014.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources