Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 17;7(1):19.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6.

Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design

Affiliations

Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design

Renzo Guarnieri et al. Int J Implant Dent. .

Abstract

Background: Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal parameters, marginal bone levels, and proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants.

Material and methods: Twenty-four patients each received 2 implants with one-stage protocol in a split-mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser microgrooved surface (LMS group) and one healing and prosthetic abutments with machined surface (MS group) were used. Four months following implant placement (T0), the healing abutments were disconnnected and reconnected three times to carry out the impression procedures and metal framework try-in. Four weeks later (T1), definitive prosthetic abutments were installated with screw-retained crowns. Modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at T0 and T1. At the same time points, samples for immunological analyses were taken from the sulcus around each implant. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were analyzed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using the ELISA kit.

Results: At T0 and T1, mPI and mGI showed no statistical difference between the two groups, while higher PD and BoP values were noted for the MS group (P < 0.05). The mean PICF volume and mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and (TNF)-α in the LMS group were statistically less than those in the MS group (P < 0.05). In addition, comparison of IL-6 and IL-1β mean concentrations at T0 and T1 in the MS group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) over time, which was not noted for the LMS.

Conclusion: Disconnection/reconnection of healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser-microgrooved surface resulted in less inflammatory molecular response compared with conventional machined ones.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04415801 , registered 03/06/2020.

Keywords: Abutments; Cytokines; Inflammation; Peri-implant crevicular fluid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Renzo Guarnieri, Gabriele Miccoli, Rodolfo Reda, Alessandro Mazzoni, Dario Di Nardo, and Luca Testarelli state that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the study outline and follow-up visits
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean mPI and mGI values recorded around LMS and MS abutments during the study period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean BoP and PD values recorded around LMS and MS abutments during the study period
Fig 4
Fig 4
Mean values of PICF (μl) detected in the LMS and MS groups
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean levels of interleukin 1β (pg/mL) detected in the LMS and MS groups
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of the level of interleukin IL-6 (pg/mL) detected in the LMS and MS groups
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of the level of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (pg/mL) detected in LMS and MS

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Comut AA, Weber HP, Shortkroff S, Cui FZ, Spector M. Connective tissue orientation around dental implants in a canine model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:433–440. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120502.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(5):448–455. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290510.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mustafa K, Odén A, Wennerberg A, Hultenby K, Arvidson K. The influence of surface topography of ceramic abutments on the attachment and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts. Biomat. 2005;26(4):373–381. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, Mihatovic I, Wieland M, Sager M, Becker J. Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2171–2184. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070157. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:481–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01341.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources