Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Mar;188(6):e25.
doi: 10.1002/vetr.25. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

A comparison of cytological quality between fine-needle aspiration and non-aspiration techniques for obtaining ultrasound-guided samples from canine and feline lymph nodes

James Whitlock  1 , Olivier Taeymans  2 , Paola Monti  3
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of cytological quality between fine-needle aspiration and non-aspiration techniques for obtaining ultrasound-guided samples from canine and feline lymph nodes

James Whitlock et al. Vet Rec. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: In small animal medicine, ultrasound-guided fine-needle lymph node sampling plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic investigation of a range of pathologies including the staging of neoplastic disease. Traditionally fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been employed to produce samples, but fine needle non-aspiration cytology (FNNAC) has been suggested to generate superior sample quality and diagnosticity.

Methods: In a randomised control trial, 104 canine and feline lymph nodes were each sampled by both techniques. The cytological samples were then submitted to pathologists who were blinded to the technique used to generate each sample. They determined if the sample was diagnostic or non-diagnostic and graded the sample in terms of the degree of cellularity, cellular preservation and haemodilution.

Results: It was found that lymph node samples obtained using the FNAC technique were more likely to be diagnostic (p = 0.043) than samples obtained using the FNNAC technique. In addition, FNAC samples had significantly higher cellularity than FNNAC counterparts (P = 0.043). No significant difference in cell preservation or haemodilution was found between samples from the FNAC and FNNAC groups.

Conclusion: In this study, FNAC was superior to non-aspiration cytology for the sampling of canine and feline lymph nodes as it generated a higher number of diagnostic samples with greater cellularity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams VJ, Evans KM, Sampson J, Wood JLN. Methods and mortality results of a health survey of purebred dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract. 2010;51:512-24.
    1. de Araújo MR, Campos LC, Ferreira E, Cassali GD. Quantitation of the regional lymph node metastatic burden and prognosis in malignant mammary tumors of dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2015;67:1360-7.
    1. Herring ES, Smith MM, Robertson JL. Lymph node staging of oral and maxillofacial neoplasms in 31 dogs and cats. J Vet Dent. 2002;19:122-6.
    1. Hillers KR, Dernell WS, Lafferty MH, Withrow SJ, Lana SE. Incidence and prognostic importance of lymph node metastases in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma: 228 Cases (1986-2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;226:1364-7.
    1. Eich CS, Whitehair JG, Moroff SD, Heeb LA. The accuracy of intraoperative cytopathological diagnosis compared with conventional histopathological diagnosis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2000;36:16-8.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources