Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;24(3):731-743.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13230. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Affiliations

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Shingisai Chando et al. Health Expect. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Evaluations of health interventions for Indigenous peoples rarely report outcomes that reflect participant and community perspectives of their experiences. Inclusion of such data may provide a fuller picture of the impact of health programmes and improve the usefulness of evaluation assessments.

Aim: To describe stakeholder perspectives and experiences of the implementation and impact of Indigenous health programmes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies evaluating complex health interventions designed for Indigenous communities in high-income countries. We searched 6 electronic databases (through to January 2020): MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EconLit and CINAHL and hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles.

Results: From 28 studies involving 677 stakeholders (mostly clinical staff and participants), six main themes were identified: enabling engagement, regaining control of health, improving social health and belonging, preserving community and culture, cultivating hope for a better life, and threats to long-term programme viability.

Conclusion: The prominence of social, emotional and spiritual well-being as important aspects of the health journey for participants in this review highlights the need to reframe evaluations of health programmes implemented in Indigenous communities away from assessments that focus on commonly used biomedical measures. Evaluators, in consultation with the community, should consistently assess the capacity of health professionals to meet community needs and expectations throughout the life of the programme. Evaluations that include qualitative data on participant and community-level outcomes can improve decision-makers' understanding of the impact that health programmes have on communities.

Patient or public contribution: This paper is a review of evaluation studies and did not involve patients or the public.

Keywords: Indigenous health; health policy; health services; impact evaluation; outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search results
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Thematic schema. Interventions that enabled engagement by providing ease of access to health services, ensuring participants felt known, valued, safe, confident in the programme's methods to address their health condition, and included programme champions were valued. Once engaged, participants regained control of their health, experienced improved social health and sense of belonging and felt that their participation contributed towards preserving their culture and community. Participants experienced these impacts throughout the life of the programme adding to a greater sense of hope around achieving health goals. When the long‐term programme viability was threatened, engagement was disrupted and confidence diminished in health programmes. The potential to achieve important individual and community outcomes was weakened as trust was eroded.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hudson S, Salvatierra CAM, Andres C. Evaluating Indigenous programs: A toolkit for change: Centre for Independent Studies Sydney; Australia, NSW; 2017.
    1. Muir S, Dean A. Evaluating the outcomes of programs for Indigenous families and communities. Family Matters. 2017;99:56.
    1. Kawakami AJ, Aton K, Cram F, Lai M, Porima L. Improving the practice of evaluation through Indigenous values and methods. Fund Issues Eval. New York and London: Guilford Press; 2008;219‐242.
    1. Chando S, Howell M, Young C, et al. Outcomes reported in evaluations of programs designed to improve health in Indigenous people. Health Services Research. Under Review. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelaher M, Luke J, Ferdinand A, Chamravi D, Ewen S, Paradies Y. An evaluation framework to improve aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Report Carlton: Lowitja Institute; 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources