Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
- PMID: 33729648
- PMCID: PMC8235882
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13230
Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Abstract
Background: Evaluations of health interventions for Indigenous peoples rarely report outcomes that reflect participant and community perspectives of their experiences. Inclusion of such data may provide a fuller picture of the impact of health programmes and improve the usefulness of evaluation assessments.
Aim: To describe stakeholder perspectives and experiences of the implementation and impact of Indigenous health programmes.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies evaluating complex health interventions designed for Indigenous communities in high-income countries. We searched 6 electronic databases (through to January 2020): MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EconLit and CINAHL and hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles.
Results: From 28 studies involving 677 stakeholders (mostly clinical staff and participants), six main themes were identified: enabling engagement, regaining control of health, improving social health and belonging, preserving community and culture, cultivating hope for a better life, and threats to long-term programme viability.
Conclusion: The prominence of social, emotional and spiritual well-being as important aspects of the health journey for participants in this review highlights the need to reframe evaluations of health programmes implemented in Indigenous communities away from assessments that focus on commonly used biomedical measures. Evaluators, in consultation with the community, should consistently assess the capacity of health professionals to meet community needs and expectations throughout the life of the programme. Evaluations that include qualitative data on participant and community-level outcomes can improve decision-makers' understanding of the impact that health programmes have on communities.
Patient or public contribution: This paper is a review of evaluation studies and did not involve patients or the public.
Keywords: Indigenous health; health policy; health services; impact evaluation; outcomes.
© 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None to declare.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34706066 Free PMC article.
-
Community views on mass drug administration for filariasis: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 17;2(2):CD013638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013638.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35174482 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29664187 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-deployment programmes for building resilience in military and frontline emergency service personnel.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD013242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013242.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34870330 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36367232 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Systemic interventions towards kidney health equity in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2025 Jun;21(6):360-361. doi: 10.1038/s41581-025-00943-4. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40050697 No abstract available.
-
Equity in prenatal healthcare services globally: an umbrella review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06388-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38468220 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing epistemic injustice in the mental healthcare of Indigenous people in Bangladesh: Implications for global mental health.Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 May 22;12:e52. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10008. eCollection 2025. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025. PMID: 40556712 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hudson S, Salvatierra CAM, Andres C. Evaluating Indigenous programs: A toolkit for change: Centre for Independent Studies Sydney; Australia, NSW; 2017.
-
- Muir S, Dean A. Evaluating the outcomes of programs for Indigenous families and communities. Family Matters. 2017;99:56.
-
- Kawakami AJ, Aton K, Cram F, Lai M, Porima L. Improving the practice of evaluation through Indigenous values and methods. Fund Issues Eval. New York and London: Guilford Press; 2008;219‐242.
-
- Kelaher M, Luke J, Ferdinand A, Chamravi D, Ewen S, Paradies Y. An evaluation framework to improve aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Report Carlton: Lowitja Institute; 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources