Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 17;21(5):14.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01381-9.

Body Composition Methods in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes or at Risk for T2D: a Clinical Review

Nadia Markie Sneed  1 , Shannon A Morrison  2
Affiliations
Review

Body Composition Methods in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes or at Risk for T2D: a Clinical Review

Nadia Markie Sneed et al. Curr Diab Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this study is to summarize anthropometric and advanced methods used to assess body composition in adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or at risk for T2D that provide clinically relevant information about T2D disease-related complications or risk factors.

Recent findings: Anthropometry is commonly used in clinical settings; however, provides unreliable estimates of fat mass, fat-free mass, and body fat distribution for metabolic health assessments compared to advanced techniques such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Few studies report the clinical use of anthropometric and advanced body composition methods that identify T2D disease-related complications or T2D risk factors. Anthropometry, BIA, DXA, CT, and MRI were used to estimate body adiposity and distribution, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue depots, and skeletal muscle mass. Review findings indicate that these methods were capable of identifying clinically relevant T2D disease-related complications such as sarcopenia and T2D risk factors such as obesity or regional adiposity. However, estimates were often sex and race/ethnicity specific warranting cross-validation of these methods in broader populations with T2D or risk for T2D prior to clinical implementation.

Keywords: Body composition; Clinical review; Prediabetes; Type 2 diabetes; Type 2 diabetes risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Supplement 1):S13. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002 . - DOI
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.
    1. Lee SY, Gallagher D. Assessment methods in human body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11(5):566–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32830b5f23 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Teigen LM, Kuchnia AJ, Mourtzakis M, Earthman CP. The use of technology for estimating body composition(strengths and weaknesses of common modalities in a clinical setting [Formula: see text]). Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32(1):20–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533616676264 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mooney SJ, Baecker A, Rundle AG. Comparison of anthropometric and body composition measures as predictors of components of the metabolic syndrome in a clinical setting. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2012;7(1):e55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2012.10.004 . - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources