Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Mar 18;384(11):1028-1037.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029073.

Pegcetacoplan versus Eculizumab in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pegcetacoplan versus Eculizumab in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Peter Hillmen et al. N Engl J Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, acquired disease characterized by chronic complement-mediated hemolysis. C5 inhibition controls intravascular hemolysis in untreated PNH but cannot address extravascular hemolysis. Pegcetacoplan, a pegylated peptide targeting proximal complement protein C3, potentially inhibits both intravascular and extravascular hemolysis.

Methods: We conducted a phase 3 open-label, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan as compared with eculizumab in adults with PNH and hemoglobin levels lower than 10.5 g per deciliter despite eculizumab therapy. After a 4-week run-in phase in which all patients received pegcetacoplan plus eculizumab, we randomly assigned patients to subcutaneous pegcetacoplan monotherapy (41 patients) or intravenous eculizumab (39 patients). The primary end point was the mean change in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 16. Additional clinical and hematologic markers of hemolysis and safety were assessed.

Results: Pegcetacoplan was superior to eculizumab with respect to the change in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 16, with an adjusted (least squares) mean difference of 3.84 g per deciliter (P<0.001). A total of 35 patients (85%) receiving pegcetacoplan as compared with 6 patients (15%) receiving eculizumab no longer required transfusions. Noninferiority of pegcetacoplan to eculizumab was shown for the change in absolute reticulocyte count but not for the change in lactate dehydrogenase level. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores improved from baseline in the pegcetacoplan group. The most common adverse events that occurred during treatment in the pegcetacoplan and eculizumab groups were injection site reactions (37% vs. 3%), diarrhea (22% vs. 3%), breakthrough hemolysis (10% vs. 23%), headache (7% vs. 23%), and fatigue (5% vs. 15%). There were no cases of meningitis in either group.

Conclusions: Pegcetacoplan was superior to eculizumab in improving hemoglobin and clinical and hematologic outcomes in patients with PNH by providing broad hemolysis control, including control of intravascular and extravascular hemolysis. (Funded by Apellis Pharmaceuticals; PEGASUS ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03500549.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Pegcetacoplan versus Eculizumab in PNH.
    Ueda Y, Takamori H, Nishimura JI. Ueda Y, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1723-1724. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2106424. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34706182 No abstract available.
  • Pegcetacoplan versus Eculizumab in PNH.
    Kulasekararaj AG, Gandhi S, Brodsky RA. Kulasekararaj AG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1724-1725. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2106424. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34706183 No abstract available.
  • Pegcetacoplan versus Eculizumab in PNH.
    Gurnari C, Pagliuca S, Maciejewski JP. Gurnari C, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1725. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2106424. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34706184 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources