Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis
- PMID: 33731072
- PMCID: PMC7972233
- DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01136-z
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves survival in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis
Abstract
Background: To analyze whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) could improve the survival for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT). Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and chemoradiotherapy before surgery have been shown to improve overall long-term survival for patients with adenocarcinoma in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction compared to surgery alone. It remains controversial whether nCRT is superior to nCT.
Methods: 170 Patients with locally advanced (cT3-4NxM0) Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with or without concurrent radiotherapy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was used and delivered in 5 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy per week for 5 weeks (total dose of PTV: 45 Gy). 120 Patients were included in the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to compare the effects of nCRT with nCT on survival.
Results: With a median follow-up of 41.2 months for patients alive after propensity score matching analysis, the 1- and 3-year OS were 84.8%, 55.0% in nCRT group and 78.3%, 38.3% in nCT group (P = 0.040; HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.02-2.69). The 1- and 3-year PFS were 84.9%, 49.2% in nCRT group and 68.3%, 29.0% in nCT group (P = 0.010; HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.14-2.85). The pathological complete response (pCR) was 17.0% in nCRT group and 1.9% in nCT group (P = 0.030). No significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the two groups.
Conclusion: The nCRT confers a better survival with improved R0 resection rate and pCR rate compared with nCT for the patients with locally advanced AEG.
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant treatment; Propensity score matching analysis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery versus direct surgery in the treatment of Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: long-term prognostic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):128-137. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201019-00565. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 33508918 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Comparison of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):502-508. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.026. Epub 2018 Jan 9. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29395438
-
Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis comparing toxicity, pathologic outcome, and survival.J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;115(7):812-820. doi: 10.1002/jso.24596. Epub 2017 Mar 7. J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28267212
-
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Future Oncol. 2019 Jul;15(20):2413-2422. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0024. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Future Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31269806
-
Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2000 Dec;1(5):387-98. doi: 10.1007/s11864-000-0066-1. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2000. PMID: 12057146 Review.
Cited by
-
Preferred neoadjuvant therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Gastric Cancer. 2022 Sep;25(5):982-987. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01314-9. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Gastric Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35704113
-
Altered genome‑wide hydroxymethylation analysis for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in esophageal cancer.Exp Ther Med. 2022 Nov 24;25(1):29. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11728. eCollection 2023 Jan. Exp Ther Med. 2022. PMID: 36561617 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison Between Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Treating Esophageal Carcinoma: A Study at a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in Suburban India.Cureus. 2022 Jul 9;14(7):e26674. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26674. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35949733 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in multidisciplinary therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 21;28(31):4299-4309. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4299. World J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 36159003 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment Options for T1 Stage Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211063955. doi: 10.1177/10732748211063955. Cancer Control. 2021. PMID: 34913741 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5210–5218. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous