Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):166.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02611-0.

Building sustainable research capacity at higher learning institutions in Tanzania through mentoring of the Young Research Peers

Affiliations

Building sustainable research capacity at higher learning institutions in Tanzania through mentoring of the Young Research Peers

Emmanuel Balandya et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Sustainability of research culture in Sub-Saharan Africa is threatened in part by the lack of a critical mass of young researchers with the requisite skills and interest to undertake research careers. This paper describes an intensive mentorship programme combining hierarchical (vertical) and peer-to-peer (horizontal) mentoring strategies among young researchers in a resource limited setting in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: A consortium of three partnering large Tanzanian health training institutions (MUHAS, CUHAS and KCMUCo) and two collaborating US institutions (UCSF and Duke University) was formed as part of the five-year Transforming Health Professions Education in Tanzania (THET) project, funded by the NIH through Health Professional Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI). Within THET, the Community of Young Research Peers (CYRP) was formed, comprising of inter-professional and cross-institutional team of 12 Master-level Young Research Peers and 10 co-opted fellows from the former MEPI-Junior Faculty (MEPI-JF) project. The Young Peers received mentorship from senior researchers from the consortium through mentored research awards and research training, and in turn provided reciprocal peer-to-peer mentorship as well as mentorship to undergraduate students.

Results: At the end of the first 2 years of the project, all 12 Young Peers were proceeding well with mentored research awards, and some were at more advanced stages. For example, three articles were already published in peer reviewed journals and two other manuscripts were in final stages of preparation. All 12 Young Peers participated in CYRP-wide thematic training workshops on mentoring and secondary data analysis; 11 had undertaken at least three research training short courses in identified areas of need; 9 joined at least one other ongoing research project; 5 made at least one scientific presentation, and 5 participated in at least one submitted grant application. Half of the Young Peers have enrolled in PhD programmes. A collective total of 41 undergraduate students were actively mentored by the Young Peers in research.

Conclusion: The CYRP has demonstrated to be an effective model for dual vertical and horizontal mentorship in research to young investigators in resource-limited settings. This model is recommended to educators working on developing research competence of early career researchers, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Keywords: Community of young research peers; Peer-to-peer mentoring; Vertical mentoring; Young researcher.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Young Peers career growth 2018–2020. A number of academic and scientific growth milestones were achieved by the Young Peers in the first two years of the project
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Undergraduate students mentored. 41 undergraduate students within and beyond Medicine and Nursing programmes were actively mentored by the Young Peers as part of the mentored research projects by the end of project year 2. Med Lab Sciences = Medical Laboratory Sciences; Environ. Occup. Health = Environmental and Occupational Health
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of anonymous feedback from Young Peers after first year of the project. Responses of Young Research Peers to questions evaluating their satisfaction with the conduct of the project. Bars indicate mean responses and error bars indicate standard deviation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chu KM, Jayaraman S, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G. Building research capacity in Africa: equity and Global Health collaborations. PLoS Med. 2014;11(3):e1001612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mkony CA, Kaaya EE, Goodell AJ, Macfarlane SB. Where teachers are few: documenting available faculty in five Tanzanian medical schools. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):32717. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.32717. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sawyerr A. African universities and the challenge of research capacity Development1. J High Educ Africa. 2004;2(1):213–242.
    1. Munabi IG, Buwembo W, Joseph R, Peter K, Bajunirwe F, Mwaka ES. Students’ perspectives of undergraduate research methods education at three public medical schools in Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collier P. Why peer mentoring is an effective approach for promoting college student success. Metrop Univ. 2017;28(3). 10.18060/21539.

LinkOut - more resources