Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;35(11):3188-3200.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01217-1. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Interleukin-10 suppression enhances T-cell antitumor immunity and responses to checkpoint blockade in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Affiliations

Interleukin-10 suppression enhances T-cell antitumor immunity and responses to checkpoint blockade in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

J R Rivas et al. Leukemia. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

T-cell dysfunction is a hallmark of B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), where CLL cells downregulate T-cell responses through regulatory molecules including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10). Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) aims to restore T-cell function by preventing the ligation of inhibitory receptors like PD-1. However, most CLL patients do not respond well to this therapy. Thus, we investigated whether IL-10 suppression could enhance antitumor T-cell activity and responses to ICB. Since CLL IL-10 expression depends on Sp1, we utilized a novel, better tolerated analogue of the Sp1 inhibitor mithramycin (MTMox32E) to suppress CLL IL-10. MTMox32E treatment inhibited mouse and human CLL IL-10 production and maintained T-cell effector function in vitro. In the Eμ-Tcl1 mouse model, treatment reduced plasma IL-10 and CLL burden and increased CD8+ T-cell proliferation, effector and memory cell prevalence, and interferon-γ production. When combined with ICB, suppression of IL-10 improved responses to anti-PD-L1 as shown by a 4.5-fold decrease in CLL cell burden compared to anti-PD-L1 alone. Combination therapy also produced more interferon-γ+, cytotoxic effector KLRG1+, and memory CD8+ T-cells, and fewer exhausted T-cells. Since current therapies for CLL do not target IL-10, this provides a novel strategy to improve immunotherapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests:

J.S.T. is a co-founder of Centrose (Madision, WI, USA). No other authors have competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. CLL IL-10 suppresses T-cell responses.
(A) Proliferation of CLL-primed CD8+ T-cells in response to anti-CD3 or varying numbers of Eμ-TCL1 splenocytes after 72 hours of stimulation, with or without 10μg/mL anti-IL-10. Secreted IL-10 (B) and IFN-γ (C) from cultures in panel A (Eμ-TCL1 spleen cells alone produced 986pg/mL IL-10 and 80pg/mL IFN-γ). (D) Proliferation of CLL-primed CD8+ T-cells stimulated with anti-CD3 or varying numbers of Eμ-TCL1 splenocytes after 72 hours with or without 1μM MTMox32E. Secreted IL-10 (E) and IFN-γ (F) from cultures in panel D (Eμ-TCL1 spleen cells alone produced 948pg/mL IL-10 and 78pg/mL IFN-γ). (G-H) Normalized proliferation (BrdU incorporation) of healthy donor (G) or CLL patient (H) human CD8+ T-cells in response to a 5-day stimulation with plate bound anti-CD3 with soluble anti-CD28 and recombinant human IL-10. (I-J) Normalized intracellular IFN-γ production from cells in (G-H), measured by flow cytometry. Frequency of responding cells in G-J were normalized to responses of CD8+ T-cells from same donor/patient cultured without IL-10. Two-way ANOVA between control and antibody or inhibitor treatment was used to calculate statistical significance. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. MTMox32E suppresses CLL IL-10 without dampening in vitro T-cell responses.
(A) Secreted IL-10 from Eμ-TCL1 splenocytes, IL-2 from murine C57BL/6 CD4+ T-cells, and IFN-γ from murine C57BL/6 CD8+ T-cells cultured for 24 hours with MTMox32E, normalized to vehicle control (660pg/mL, 398pg/mL, 106pg/mL, respectively). T-cells were stimulated with 10μg/mL soluble anti-CD3. (B) Proliferation (BrdU incorporation) of C57BL/6 CD8+ T-cells cultured for 72 hours with 10μg/mL anti-CD3 + MTMox32E (error bars are too small to be seen). (C) Secreted IL-10 from human CLL PBMCs stimulated with 25μg/mL anti-IgM for 24 hours with MTMox32E, normalized to vehicle control (17–656pg/mL). (D) Promoter occupancy of Sp1 GC-rich sites on the human IL-10 promoter in Mec1 cells treated with 1000nM MTMox32E. Statistical comparisons made by two-way ANOVA in A and one-way ANOVA in D. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. MTMox32E enhances anti-CLL activity of CD8+ T-cells and suppresses CLL IL-10 production in vivo.
(A-B) Frequency of Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the blood of NSG mice (mean + SEM). Six groups of eight NSG mice were injected with Eμ-TCL1 CLL, with or without Eμ-TCL1 primed CD8+ T-cells (CLL to T-cell ratio of 32:1) and received 150μg anti-IL-10 or isotype every two days (A) or 12mg/kg MTMox32E or vehicle every three days (B). Stars indicate statistical significance of differences between control and anti-IL-10 (A) or MTMox32E (B) treated group. (C-D) Plasma IL-10 levels in NSG mice (mean + SEM). Stars indicate significance between control and anti-IL-10 (C) or MTMox32E (D) treated group. (E) Burden of Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the spleens of NSG mice without CD8+ T-cells (left panel, euthanized day 17) and with CD8+ T-cells (right panel, euthanized day 22) in the MTMox32E group. (F) Count of IL-10+ Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the spleens of NSG mice without CD8+ T-cells (left, day 17) and with CD8+ T-cells (right, day 22). (G) Count of proliferative (BrdU+) Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the spleens of NSG mice without CD8+ T-cells (left, day 17) and with CD8+ T-cells (right, day 22). Statistical comparisons made by two-way ANOVA in A-D, and one-way ANOVA in E-G. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, VC=vehicle control, x=mice euthanized at indicated earlier timepoint
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Inhibiting CLL IL-10 with MTMox32E increases the numbers of T- effector cells.
Mice were treated as in Figure 3B. (A) The number of CD8+ T-cells in the blood of NSG mice. (B) (Left) Representative histograms of BrdU incorporation by splenic CD5+CD19- T-cells (>99% CD8+). Frequency (middle) and number (right) of BrdU+ splenic CD8+ T-cells. (C) (Left) Representative histograms of IFN-γ production by splenic CD8+ T-cells. Frequency (middle) and number (right) of splenic IFN-γ+ CD8+ T-cells. (D) Frequency (left) and number (right) of GzB+ CD8+ T-cells in the spleen. (E) Frequency of KLRG1+ highly cytotoxic effector and CD27+ memory CD8+ T-cells in the spleen (left) and pie chart representations of CD8+ T-cell proportions. (F) Frequency of PD-1 expressing CD8+ T-cells in the blood. Statistical comparisons in A+F were obtained by two-way ANOVA comparing vehicle to MTMox32E treated mice, and in B-E by one-way ANOVA between vehicle to MTMox32E. *p<0.05
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. Anti-PD-L1 checkpoint blockade is more effective when combined with IL-10 suppression by MTMox32E.
Three groups of thirteen NSG mice were injected with Eμ-TCL1 and Eμ-TCL1 primed CD8+ T-cells at a ratio of one T-cell to 32 CLL cells. Mice received 12mg/kg MTMox32E or vehicle every two to three days plus 10mg/kg anti-PD-L1 or isotype control every three days. (A) Frequency of Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the blood of NSG mice (mean + SEM). (B-C) Frequency (B) and count (C) of Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the spleen. (D) Frequency (left) and count (right) of CD8+ T-cells in the spleen of recipient NSG mice. (E) Frequency of CD8+ T-cells in the blood of NSG recipients (mean + SEM). (F) Frequency (left) and count (right) of Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the bone marrow. (G) Percent of mice with less than 30% CLL in the blood over time. Statistical significance in A, E, G was calculated by two-way ANOVA comparing vehicle to treated mice, and by one-way ANOVA comparing vehicle to treated mice in remaining panels. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 indicate statistical significance of *difference between combination and ICB alone, #difference between combination and control, &difference between ICB alone and control
Figure 6:
Figure 6:. T-cells from Eμ-TCL1 mice are more functional when treated with both anti-PD-L1 checkpoint blockade and IL-10 blockade.
Mice were treated as in Figure 5. (A) Count of BrdU+ splenic CD8+ T-cells. (B) Count of BrdU+ Eμ-TCL1 CLL cells in the spleen. (C) Frequency of KLRG1+ highly cytotoxic effector and CD27+ memory CD8+ T-cells in the spleen (left) and pie chart representations of CD8+ T-cell proportions. (D-E) Count of IFN-γ+ (D) and GzB+ (E) splenic CD8+ T-cells. (F) Frequency of CD107a+ splenic CD8+ T-cells. (G) Comparison of CLL frequency in spleen from Fig. 5B and Fig. S5B. (H) Comparison of CLL frequency in the blood from Figures 3B and 5A. Statistical comparisons done by one-way ANOVA comparing vehicle to treated mice, except in G+H where all groups were compared to each other. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001
Figure 7:
Figure 7:. Cooperation of IL-10 suppression and immune checkpoint blockade.
Created with BioRender.com. Model shows combining IL-10 suppression with anti-PD-L1 ICB enhances antitumor CD8+ T-cell activity by counteracting multiple methods of CLL immune suppression.

References

    1. Brusa D, Serra S, Coscia M, Rossi D, D’Arena G, Laurenti L, et al. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis contributes to T-cell dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2013;98(6):953–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McClanahan F, Riches JC, Miller S, Day WP, Kotsiou E, Neuberg D, et al. Mechanisms of PD-L1/PD-1-mediated CD8 T-cell dysfunction in the context of aging-related immune defects in the Emicro-TCL1 CLL mouse model. Blood. 2015;126(2):212–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiLillo DJ, Weinberg JB, Yoshizaki A, Horikawa M, Bryant JM, Iwata Y, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and regulatory B cells share IL-10 competence and immunosuppressive function. Leukemia. 2013;27(1):170–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhakeem SS, McKenna MK, Oben KZ, Noothi SK, Rivas JR, Hildebrandt GC, et al. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia-Derived IL-10 Suppresses Antitumor Immunity. J Immunol. 2018;200(12):4180–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhakeem SS, Sindhava VJ, McKenna MK, Gachuki BW, Byrd JC, Muthusamy N, et al. Role of B cell receptor signaling in IL-10 production by normal and malignant B-1 cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1362:239–49. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms