Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate
- PMID: 33731930
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z
Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7856):E25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03496-1. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33833440 No abstract available.
Abstract
The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action.
Comment in
-
Ocean protection needs a spirit of compromise.Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7850):346. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00673-0. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33731952 No abstract available.
-
Portugal leads with Europe's largest marine reserve.Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7893):318. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00093-8. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35042996 No abstract available.
-
A path forward for analysing the impacts of marine protected areas.Nature. 2022 Jul;607(7917):E1-E2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04775-1. Epub 2022 Jul 6. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35794262 No abstract available.
-
Reply to: Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling.Nature. 2023 May;617(7960):E3-E5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37165243 No abstract available.
-
Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling.Nature. 2023 May;617(7960):E1-E2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7. Epub 2023 May 10. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37165247 No abstract available.
-
Global effects of marine protected areas on food security are unknown.Nature. 2023 Sep;621(7979):E34-E36. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06493-8. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37730877 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Marine spatial planning to solve increasing conflicts at sea: A framework for prioritizing offshore windfarms and marine protected areas.J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 1;339:117857. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117857. Epub 2023 Apr 7. J Environ Manage. 2023. PMID: 37031598
-
Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284711. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. Update in: PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0307324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307324. PMID: 37079655 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
A global network of marine protected areas for food.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 10;117(45):28134-28139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000174117. Epub 2020 Oct 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. Retraction in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 26;118(43):e2117750118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117750118. PMID: 33106411 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maximizing the effectiveness of national commitments to protected area expansion for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem carbon under climate change.Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(15):3395-3414. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15645. Epub 2021 May 10. Glob Chang Biol. 2021. PMID: 33852186 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Global sustainability assessment of cephalopod fisheries based on pressure-state-response framework.iScience. 2024 Sep 17;27(10):110986. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110986. eCollection 2024 Oct 18. iScience. 2024. PMID: 39429774 Free PMC article.
-
Blue carbon storage in a sub-Antarctic marine protected area.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71319-0. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39232073 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the effects of mobile bottom fishing on benthic carbon processing and storage: a systematic review protocol.Environ Evid. 2024 Oct 15;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13750-024-00348-z. Environ Evid. 2024. PMID: 39402692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue by Bio-Based Sodium Alginate/Lignin Composite Hydrogel Beads.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jul 19;14(14):2917. doi: 10.3390/polym14142917. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35890693 Free PMC article.
-
Priority areas to protect mangroves and maximise ecosystem services.Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 21;14(1):5863. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41333-3. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37735160 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sala, E. & Giakoumi, S. No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 75, 1166–1168 (2018). - DOI
-
- Marine Conservation Institute. The Marine Protection Atlas. http://mpatlas.org (2020).
-
- Santos, C. F. et al. Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nat. Sustain. 3, 505–516 (2020). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources