Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate
- PMID: 33731930
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z
Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate
Erratum in
- 
  
  Author Correction: Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7856):E25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03496-1. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33833440 No abstract available.
Abstract
The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action.
Comment in
- 
  
  Ocean protection needs a spirit of compromise.Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7850):346. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00673-0. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33731952 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Portugal leads with Europe's largest marine reserve.Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7893):318. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00093-8. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35042996 No abstract available.
- 
  
  A path forward for analysing the impacts of marine protected areas.Nature. 2022 Jul;607(7917):E1-E2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04775-1. Epub 2022 Jul 6. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35794262 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Reply to: Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling.Nature. 2023 May;617(7960):E3-E5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06015-6. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37165243 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Quantifying the carbon benefits of ending bottom trawling.Nature. 2023 May;617(7960):E1-E2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06014-7. Epub 2023 May 10. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37165247 No abstract available.
- 
  
  Global effects of marine protected areas on food security are unknown.Nature. 2023 Sep;621(7979):E34-E36. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06493-8. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Nature. 2023. PMID: 37730877 No abstract available.
References
- 
    - Sala, E. & Giakoumi, S. No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 75, 1166–1168 (2018). - DOI
 
- 
    - Marine Conservation Institute. The Marine Protection Atlas. http://mpatlas.org (2020).
 
- 
    - Santos, C. F. et al. Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nat. Sustain. 3, 505–516 (2020). - DOI
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
 
        