Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;592(7854):397-402.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate

Affiliations

Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate

Enric Sala et al. Nature. 2021 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.
    Sala E, Mayorga J, Bradley D, Cabral RB, Atwood TB, Auber A, Cheung W, Costello C, Ferretti F, Friedlander AM, Gaines SD, Garilao C, Goodell W, Halpern BS, Hinson A, Kaschner K, Kesner-Reyes K, Leprieur F, McGowan J, Morgan LE, Mouillot D, Palacios-Abrantes J, Possingham HP, Rechberger KD, Worm B, Lubchenco J. Sala E, et al. Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7856):E25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03496-1. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33833440 No abstract available.

Abstract

The ocean contains unique biodiversity, provides valuable food resources and is a major sink for anthropogenic carbon. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an effective tool for restoring ocean biodiversity and ecosystem services1,2, but at present only 2.7% of the ocean is highly protected3. This low level of ocean protection is due largely to conflicts with fisheries and other extractive uses. To address this issue, here we developed a conservation planning framework to prioritize highly protected MPAs in places that would result in multiple benefits today and in the future. We find that a substantial increase in ocean protection could have triple benefits, by protecting biodiversity, boosting the yield of fisheries and securing marine carbon stocks that are at risk from human activities. Our results show that most coastal nations contain priority areas that can contribute substantially to achieving these three objectives of biodiversity protection, food provision and carbon storage. A globally coordinated effort could be nearly twice as efficient as uncoordinated, national-level conservation planning. Our flexible prioritization framework could help to inform both national marine spatial plans4 and global targets for marine conservation, food security and climate action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sala, E. & Giakoumi, S. No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 75, 1166–1168 (2018). - DOI
    1. Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Marine Conservation Institute. The Marine Protection Atlas. http://mpatlas.org (2020).
    1. Santos, C. F. et al. Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nat. Sustain. 3, 505–516 (2020). - DOI
    1. Costello, C. et al. The future of food from the sea. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types