Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;35(2):200-221.
doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia

Affiliations

Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia

Jessica A Brown et al. Aphasiology. 2021.

Abstract

Background: Many people with aphasia have a strong desire to participate in reading activities despite persistent reading challenges. Digital reading devices and text-to-speech (TTS) technology are increasing in popularity and have the potential to help people with aphasia. Systematic investigation of modifiable TTS features provides a means of exploring this potential.

Aims: This study's aim was to evaluate the effect of digital highlighting synchronised with TTS auditory and written output on reading comprehension by people with aphasia and to determine their highlighting preferences.

Methods & procedures: This work was registered with clinicaltrials.gov and assigned the clinical trial registry number 01446r prior to initiation of data collection. Twenty-five adults with aphasia read and listened to passages presented in three synchronised highlighting conditions: sentence highlighting, single word highlighting, and no highlighting. Participants answered comprehension questions, selected most and least preferred conditions, and provided feedback explaining highlighting preferences.

Outcome & results: Comprehension accuracy did not vary significantly across presentation conditions, but participants preferred either single word or sentence highlighting over no highlighting.

Conclusions: Neither word nor sentence highlighting benefitted or hindered comprehension by people with aphasia as a group, but individual differences may occur. Clinicians should attend to personal preferences when implementing digital highlighting as a reading support strategy.

Keywords: Aphasia; Highlighting; Multimodality presentation; Reading comprehension; Text-to-speech conversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participants’ percent accuracy across conditions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Participant opinions about sentence highlighting.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Participant opinions about single word highlighting.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Participant opinions about the no highlighting condition.

References

    1. Ayres KM, Langone J, Douglas K, Mead C, & Bell V (2008). Structural analysis of video supported electronic text for learners with moderate intellectual disabilities: A pilot investigation into assistive technology supports. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens.
    1. Baddeley AD (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. - PubMed
    1. Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, & Watts FN (1995). Handbook of Memory Disorders. England: Jon Wiley & Sons.
    1. Brennan A, Worrall L, & McKenna K (2005). The relationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: An exploratory study. Aphasiology, 19, 693–711. doi:10.1080/02687030444000958 - DOI
    1. Brock SE, & Knapp PK (1996). Reading comprehension abilities of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1, 173–185. doi: 10.1177/108705479600100305. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources