Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1:12:630268.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268. eCollection 2021.

An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation

Wenjing Pan  1 , Diyi Liu  1 , Jie Fang  1
Affiliations

An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation

Wenjing Pan et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This study examined factors including health-related anxiety, preexisting misinformation beliefs, and repeated exposure contributing to individuals' acceptance of health misinformation. Through a large-scale online survey, this study found that health-related anxiety was positively associated with health misinformation acceptance. Preexisting misinformation beliefs, as well as repeated exposure to health misinformation, were both positively associated with health misinformation acceptance. The results also showed that demographic variables were significantly associated with health misinformation acceptance. In general, females accepted more health misinformation compared to males. Participants' age was negatively associated with health misinformation acceptance. Participants' education level and income were both negatively associated with their acceptance of health misinformation.

Keywords: health misinformation; health-related anxiety; misinformation acceptance; preexisting misinformation beliefs; repeated exposure; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Survey design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Al-Qahtani A. A., Nazir N., Al-Anazi M. R., Rubino S., Al-Ahdal M. N. (2016). Zika virus: a new pandemic threat. J. Infect. Dev. Countr. 10 201–207. 10.3855/jidc.8350 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bode L., Vraga E. K. (2018). See something, say something: correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Commun. 33 1131–1140. 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brehmer B. (1976). Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychol. Bull. 83:985. 10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.985 - DOI
    1. Broniatowski D. A., Jamison A. M., Qi S., AlKulaib L., Chen T., Benton A., et al. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. Am. J. Public Health 108 1378–1384. 10.2105/ajph.2018.304567 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen L., Wang X., Peng T.-Q. (2018). Nature and diffusion of gynecologic cancer–related misinformation on social media: analysis of tweets. J. Med. Internet Res. 20:e11515. 10.2196/11515 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources