Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;12(1):10-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Safety-II and Resilience Engineering in a Nutshell: An Introductory Guide to Their Concepts and Methods

Dong-Han Ham  1
Affiliations
Review

Safety-II and Resilience Engineering in a Nutshell: An Introductory Guide to Their Concepts and Methods

Dong-Han Ham. Saf Health Work. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Traditional safety concept, which is called Safety-I, and its relevant methods and models have much contributed toward enhancing the safety of industrial systems. However, they have proved insufficient to be applied to complex socio-technical systems. As an alternative, Safety-II and resilience engineering have emerged and gained much attention for the last two decades. However, it seems that safety professionals have still difficulty understanding their fundamental concepts and methods. Accordingly, it is necessary to offer an introductory guide to them that helps safety professionals grasp them correctly in consideration of their current practices.

Methods: This article firstly explains the limitations of Safety-I and how Safety-II can resolve them from the four points of view. Next, the core concepts of resilience engineering and Functional Resonance Analysis Method are described.

Results: Workers' performance adjustment and performance variability due to it should be the basis for understanding human-related accidents in socio-technical systems. It should be acknowledged that successful and failed work performance have the same causes. However, they are not well considered in the traditional safety concept; in contrast, Safety-II and resilience engineering have conceptual bases and practical approaches to reflect them systematically.

Conclusion: It is necessary to move from a find-and-fix and reactive approach to a proactive approach to safety management. Safety-II and resilience engineering give a set of useful concepts and methods for proactive safety management. However, if necessary, Safety-I methods need to be properly used for situations where they can still be useful as well.

Keywords: FRAM; Resilience; Resilience engineering; Safety-I; Safety-II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Six aspects characterizing a function in FRAM (borrowed from [38]).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An example of FRAM model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dekker S. Ashgate; Aldershot (UK): 2002. Field guide to human error investigations.
    1. Leveson N. The MIT Press; Cambridge: 2011. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety.
    1. Yoon Y.S., Ham D.-H., Yoon W.C. A new approach to analyzing human-related accidents by combined use of HFACS and activity theory-based method. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2017;19:759–783.
    1. Yoon Y.S., Ham D.-H., Yoon W.C. Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: method and case studies. Reliability Eng System Safety. 2016;150:22–34.
    1. Hollnagel E., Leonhardt J., Licu T., Shorrock S. EUROCONTROL; Brussels (Belgium): 2013. From Safety-I to Safety-II: a white paper.

LinkOut - more resources