Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 29:3:577620.
doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.577620. eCollection 2020.

Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA

Affiliations
Review

Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA

Maria F Chan et al. Front Artif Intell. .

Abstract

The use of machine learning and other sophisticated models to aid in prediction and decision making has become widely popular across a breadth of disciplines. Within the greater diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, and medical physics communities promising work is being performed in tissue classification and cancer staging, outcome prediction, automated segmentation, treatment planning, and quality assurance as well as other areas. In this article, machine learning approaches are explored, highlighting specific applications in machine and patient-specific quality assurance (QA). Machine learning can analyze multiple elements of a delivery system on its performance over time including the multileaf collimator (MLC), imaging system, mechanical and dosimetric parameters. Virtual Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) QA can predict passing rates using different measurement techniques, different treatment planning systems, and different treatment delivery machines across multiple institutions. Prediction of QA passing rates and other metrics can have profound implications on the current IMRT process. Here we cover general concepts of machine learning in dosimetry and various methods used in virtual IMRT QA, as well as their clinical applications.

Keywords: IMRT; VMAT; artificial intelligence; machine learning; quality assurance; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpaydin E. (2010). Introduction to Machine Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    1. Carlson J. N., Park J. M., Park S. Y., Park J. I., Choi Y., Ye S. J. (2016). A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors. Phys. Med. Biol. 61:2514. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/6/2514 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chuang K. C., Adamson J., Giles W. M. (in press). A tool for patient specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files. Med. Phys. - PubMed
    1. El Naqa I., Irrer J., Ritter T. A., DeMarco J., Al-Hallaq H., Booth J., et al. . (2019). Machine learning for automated quality assurance in radiotherapy: a proof of principle using EPID data description. Med. Phys. 46, 1914–1921. 10.1002/mp.13433 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feng M., Valdes G., Dixit N., Solberg T. D. (2018). Machine learning in radiation oncology: opportunities, requirements, and needs. Front. Oncol. 8:110. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed