Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms
- PMID: 3373454
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01342639
Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms
Abstract
Deep tectal neurons in pigeons respond selectively to moving visual stimuli, and are inhibited by large background patterns moved in-phase with these stimuli. In this investigation we demonstrate that these same deep tectal neurons respond equally well to kinematograms as they do to traditional luminance contrast stimuli typically employed in visual experiments. Computer generated kinematograms, the motion domain equivalents of random dot stereograms, were used as stimuli in these experiments. These kinematograms, where a small centrally located set of random dots is moved coherently in one direction while the remaining dots are moved in a different direction, thus constitute a pure motion stimulus where the stimulus form is only visible in the dynamic pattern, but does not exist on any single frame. Both 'object' configured and 'hole' configured kinematograms were employed; the former appearing as regions of texture moving over, or in front of, the background texture, while the latter appear as windows through which a more distant textured surface is revealed. Extracellular recordings from isolated deep tectal cells showed that all units responded in a very similar manner whether the stimulus was an 'object' configured kinematogram or the more traditional luminance contrast variety. This similarity included directional selectivity, the in-phase inhibition anti-phase facilitation effect, and sensitivity to opposed motion independent of direction. However, when the kinematograms were configured as 'holes' none of the units tested responded to these stimuli. The significance of these observations for tectal functioning, image segmentation through motion and animal camouflage is discussed.
Similar articles
-
Contextual influences on the directional responses of tectal cells in pigeons.Vis Neurosci. 2002 Mar-Apr;19(2):133-44. doi: 10.1017/s0952523802191127. Vis Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 12385626
-
Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons.Exp Brain Res. 1981;43(2):173-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00237761. Exp Brain Res. 1981. PMID: 7250263
-
Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction.Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):744-5. doi: 10.1126/science.6836313. Science. 1983. PMID: 6836313
-
Comparison of pop-out responses to luminance and motion contrasting stimuli of tectal neurons in pigeons.Brain Res. 2020 Nov 15;1747:147068. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147068. Epub 2020 Aug 19. Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32827547
-
The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds.Vision Res. 1990;30(11):1677-88. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90152-b. Vision Res. 1990. PMID: 2288083 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual perception of texture in aggressive behavior of Betta splendens.J Comp Physiol A. 1991 Jul;169(1):51-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00198172. J Comp Physiol A. 1991. PMID: 1941718
-
Pigeons simultaneously attend to static and dynamic features of complex displays.Behav Processes. 2019 Jan;158:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Nov 3. Behav Processes. 2019. PMID: 30395898 Free PMC article.
-
Higher-Order Thalamic Circuits Channel Parallel Streams of Visual Information in Mice.Neuron. 2019 Apr 17;102(2):477-492.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Neuron. 2019. PMID: 30850257 Free PMC article.
-
Responses of tectal neurons to contrasting stimuli: an electrophysiological study in the barn owl.PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039559. Epub 2012 Jun 20. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22745787 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates of Perceptual Grouping by Motion in the Barn Owl.J Neurosci. 2018 Jul 25;38(30):6653-6664. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0174-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 2. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29967005 Free PMC article.