Surgical applied anatomy: alive and kicking
- PMID: 33734548
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.16680
Surgical applied anatomy: alive and kicking
Abstract
Background: Contention exists amongst anatomists, clinicians and surgeons about how much anatomical knowledge medical students need, although what is taught should be aligned with current surgical practice. The aim of this study was to explore the scope of recent advances in applied anatomy as highlighted in the ANZ Journal of Surgery in each of the surgical specialties.
Methods: The 2018 volume of the ANZ Journal of Surgery was narrowed to 254 articles by applying the search term 'anatomy'. The main topic was extracted from each paper. The content of the paper was assessed for 'novel description' or 'novel application' of anatomical knowledge and classified accordingly.
Results: Most papers with an anatomical focus were from general surgery, which focused on surgical techniques, outcomes and management. Vascular surgery had the highest percentage of papers with a novel description and application of anatomy. Although cardiothoracic and paediatric surgery had no papers with a novel description of anatomy, novel applications of anatomy were a focus in each speciality.
Conclusion: The trend towards novel applications of anatomical knowledge in all surgical specialties should encourage medical schools to shape their anatomy curricula in tandem with such advances as they evolve. The high proportion of novel applications and descriptions of anatomy in general surgery indicates continued growth as a benchmark of anatomical understanding. Vascular surgery's proportion of novel application and description of anatomy may change the way students will learn vascular anatomy to incorporate endovascular, radiologically based approaches.
Keywords: anatomy; clinical anatomy; surgical curriculum; teaching.
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Eizenberg N. Anatomy and its impact on medicine: will it continue? Australas. Med. J. 2015; 8: 373-7.
-
- Lukić IK, Gluncić V, Ivkić G, Hubenstorf M, Marusić A. Virtual dissection: a lesson from the 18th century. Lancet 2003; 362: 2110-3.
-
- Arráez-Aybar LA, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Mirapeix RM, Mompeo-Corredera B, Sañudo-Tejero JR. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Ann. Anat. 2010; 192: 341-8.
-
- Cornwall J. Perhaps we don't know what we thought we knew: why clinicians need to re-visit and re-engage with clinical anatomy. Australas. Med. J. 2013; 6: 339-40.
-
- Hale SJM, Mirjalili SA, Stringer MD. Inconsistencies in surface anatomy: the need for an evidence-based reappraisal. Clin. Anat. 2010; 23: 922-30.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical