Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jun;28(6):2037-2045.
doi: 10.1111/ene.14829. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Retinal layer thinning predicts treatment failure in relapsing multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Retinal layer thinning predicts treatment failure in relapsing multiple sclerosis

Gabriel Bsteh et al. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning are markers of neuroaxonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is reduced by disease-modifying treatment (DMT). We aimed to investigate the potential of pRNFL and GCIPL thinning for prediction of DMT failure in relapsing MS (RMS).

Methods: In this 4-year prospective observational study on 113 RMS patients, pRNFL and GCIPL were measured at DMT initiation and after 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24). Treatment failure was defined as 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and/or Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) worsening. Optimal cutoff values for predicting treatment failure were determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses and hazard ratios (HRs) by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, EDSS/SDMT, and DMT class.

Results: Thinning of GCIPL >0.5 μm/year at M24 showed superior value for treatment failure prediction (HR: 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-7.6, p < 0.001; specificity 91%, sensitivity 81%), followed by GCIPL >0.5 μm at M12 (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.4-6.9, p < 0.001; specificity 85%, sensitivity 78%), and pRNFL ≥2 μm/year at M24 (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, p = 0.023; specificity 84%, sensitivity 69%), whereas pRNFL at M12 was not predictive.

Conclusions: GCIPL, and to a lesser degree pRNFL, thinning predicts disability progression after DMT initiation and may be a useful and accessible biomarker of treatment failure in RMS.

Keywords: GCIPL; OCT; disease-modifying treatment; multiple sclerosis; retinal thinning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen, Roche, and Teva. H.H. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Siemens, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen and Teva. P.A. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva for a clinical study. M.A. received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi‐Genzyme. K.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Roche. F.D.P. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. F.L. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. P.R. has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. S.W. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Teva, Allergan, Ipsen Pharma, and Roche. A.Z. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaking honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. T.Z. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva. F.D. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi‐Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi‐Genzyme. T.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Biologix, Bionorica, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Teva, and TG Pharmaceuticals. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in MS sponsored by Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, and Teva.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic overview of study design. Small circles: relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale/Symbol Digit Modalities Test rating. Big circles: Relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale/Symbol Digit Modalities Test rating, and optical coherence tomography. DMT, disease‐modifying treatment; M, month. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Inclusion flowchart. DMT, disease‐modifying treatment; M0, baseline; M12, month 12; M24, month 24; MS, multiple sclerosis; ON, optic neuritis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Accuracy of disease‐modifying treatment failure prediction by annualized retinal layer thinning and as determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses of aLGCIPL measured after 12 and 24 months (a, b) and aLpRNFL after 12 and 24 months (c, d). aLGCIPL, annualized loss of macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; aLpRNFL, annualized loss of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; M12, measured between baseline and 12 months after DMT initiation; M24, measured between baseline and 24 months after DMT initiation.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Annualized retinal layer thinning predicts DMT failure. Probability of DMT failure regarding disability worsening (a), relapse (b), and clinical disease activity (c) as predicted by annualized loss of GCIPL and pRNFL measured 12 and 24 months after DMT initiation. aLGCIPL, annualized loss of macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; aLpRNFL, annualized loss of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; CI, confidence interval; DMT, disease‐modifying treatment; HR, hazard ratio; M12, measured between baseline and 12 months after DMT initiation; M24, measured between baseline and 24 months after DMT initiation; ns, not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2002;359:1221‐1231. - PubMed
    1. Cree BAC, Mares J, Hartung H‐P. Current therapeutic landscape in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32:365‐377. - PubMed
    1. Giovannoni G. Disease‐modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:1‐11. - PubMed
    1. Bsteh G, Hegen H, Dosser C, et al. To treat or not to treat – sequential individualized treatment evaluation in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Dis. 2019;101908. - PubMed
    1. Hegen H, Bsteh G, Berger T. ‘No evidence of disease activity’ – is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis? Eur J Neurol. 2018;359:1221‐1311. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types