Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1328-1337.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001024.

Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli

Affiliations

Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli

Jessie N Patterson et al. Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Recently developed, the Radioear B81 bone oscillator allows for higher bone conduction vibration output; however, normative data are lacking regarding its use in vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of age on cervical and ocular VEMP (c- and oVEMP) responses using the B81 and to compare with air conduction stimuli (ACS) and impulse hammer (IH) VEMP response characteristics.

Design: c- and oVEMP were completed with ACS, B81, and IH stimuli in healthy participants (age range = 10 to 87 years, n = 85).

Results: Regardless of stimulus type, c- and oVEMP amplitudes and response rates decreased with age. For cVEMP response rates, ACS performed better or equal to B81, which was superior to the IH. For cVEMP corrected amplitude, ACS had significantly higher amplitudes compared with B81 and IH. There was no difference in cVEMP corrected amplitude between B81 and IH. For oVEMP, response rates were comparable between stimuli with the largest disparity in response rates occurring in the oldest groups where IH outperformed both ACS and B81. For oVEMP amplitude, IH had significantly higher amplitudes compared with B81 and ACS. There was no difference in oVEMP amplitude between B81 and ACS.

Conclusions: Age significantly affected c- and oVEMP amplitudes regardless of stimulus type (ACS, B81, IH). All stimuli are appropriate for eliciting c- and oVEMP in the young individuals. While ACS resulted in higher cVEMP corrected amplitudes, either ACS or B81 are appropriate for older individuals. However, for oVEMPs, higher response rates and larger amplitudes were noted for IH followed by B81 and ACS. Overall, the B81 performed well across the lifespan for c- and oVEMPs and may be a reasonable bone conduction vibration option for patients with absent ACS VEMPs, but at this time is not recommended as a replacement to ACS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative responses from a 67-year old subject: A) Air-conduction (ACS) cVEMP, B) B81 cVEMP, C) Impulse hammer (IH) cVEMP, D) ACS oVEMP, E) B81 oVEMP, and F) IH oVEMP.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mixed effects modeling revealed a significant effect of age and stimulus on cVEMP corrected amplitude. As age increased, cVEMP corrected amplitude decreased (p < .001). Air-conduction stimuli (ACS) corrected amplitudes were significantly larger than B81 (p = .04) and impulse hammer (IH) (p = .02). B81 and IH corrected amplitudes did not differ significantly (p = .63).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mixed effects modeling revealed a significant effect of age on oVEMP amplitude. As age increased, oVEMP amplitude decreased (p < .001). Impulse hammer (IH) oVEMP amplitudes were significantly larger than air-conduction stimuli (ACS) (p < .01) and B81 (p < .001). ACS and B81 amplitudes did not differ significantly (p = .10).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mixed effects modeling revealed a gender by stimulus interaction on oVEMP amplitude in that the effect of gender differed significantly between impulse hammer (IH) and ACS (p < .001) and B81 (p = .02). Specifically, for impulse hammer (IH), females demonstrated larger oVEMP amplitudes compared to males.

References

    1. Akin FW & Murnane OD. (2001). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Preliminary report. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 445. - PubMed
    1. Bath AP, Harris N, McEwan, & Yardley MP. (1999). Effect of conductive hearing loss on the vestibulo-collic reflex. Clin Otolaryngol, 24:181–183. - PubMed
    1. Cheng PW, Chen CC, Wang SJ, Young YH. (2009). Acoustic, mechanical and galvanic stimulation modes elicit ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, 120:1841–1844. - PubMed
    1. Chou CH, Hsu WC, Young YH. (2012). Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials via bone-conducted vibration in children. Clin Neurophysiol, 123: 1880–1885. - PubMed
    1. Clinard CG, Piker EG, Thorne AP, Surface EN, Anderson AE, Beacham VA, Crouse MC, Whitney VH, Depaolis RA. (2019). Maximum output and low-frequency limitations of B71 and B81 clinical bone vibrators: Implications for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Ear Hear, epub ahead of print. - PubMed

Publication types