Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting
- PMID: 33736241
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144341
Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting" [Sci. Total Environ. 769 (2021) 1 - 15 / 144341].Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 2):156198. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156198. Epub 2022 May 28. Sci Total Environ. 2022. PMID: 35651196 No abstract available.
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NbS) can address climate change, biodiversity loss, human well-being and their interactions in an integrated way. A major barrier to achieving this is the lack of comprehensiveness in current carbon accounting which has focused on flows rather than stocks of carbon and led to perverse outcomes. We propose a new comprehensive approach to carbon accounting based on the whole carbon cycle, covering both stocks and flows, and linking changes due to human activities with responses in the biosphere and atmosphere. We identify enhancements to accounting, namely; inclusion of all carbon reservoirs, changes in their condition and stability, disaggregated flows, and coverage of all land areas. This comprehensive approach recognises that both carbon stocks (as storage) and carbon flows (as sequestration) contribute to the ecosystem service of global climate regulation. In contrast, current ecosystem services measurement and accounting commonly use only carbon sequestration measured as net flows, while greenhouse gas inventories use flows from sources to sinks. This flow-based accounting has incentivised planting and maintaining young forests with high carbon uptake rates, resulting, perversely, in failing to reveal the greater mitigation benefit from protecting larger, more stable and resilient carbon stocks in natural forests. We demonstrate the benefits of carbon storage and sequestration for climate mitigation, in theory as ecosystem services within an ecosystem accounting framework, and in practice using field data that reveals differences in results between accounting for stocks or flows. Our proposed holistic and comprehensive carbon accounting makes transparent the benefits, trade-offs and shortcomings of NbS actions for climate mitigation and sustainability outcomes. Adopting this approach is imperative for revision of ecosystem accounting systems under the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting and contributing to evidence-based decision-making for international conventions on climate (UNFCCC), biodiversity (CBD) and sustainability (SDGs).
Keywords: Carbon accounting; Carbon storage and sequestration; Climate regulation service; Ecosystem integrity; Nature-based solutions; System of Environmental-Economic Accounting.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Contrasting forest management strategies: Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services under changing climate and disturbance regimes.J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:123124. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123124. Epub 2024 Nov 15. J Environ Manage. 2024. PMID: 39541807
-
Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change.Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Apr;27(8):1518-1546. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15513. Epub 2021 Feb 1. Glob Chang Biol. 2021. PMID: 33522071 Review.
-
Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Dec;98(6):1945-1971. doi: 10.1111/brv.12990. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023. PMID: 37437379 Review.
-
Balancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166681. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166681. Epub 2023 Sep 4. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37673258
-
A ranking of net national contributions to climate change mitigation through tropical forest conservation.J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 10. J Environ Manage. 2014. PMID: 25214074
Cited by
-
Taxonomic, structural diversity and carbon stocks in a gradient of island forests.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):1038. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05045-w. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35058518 Free PMC article.
-
Human impacts as the main driver of tropical forest carbon.Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 17;8(24):eabl7968. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl7968. Epub 2022 Jun 17. Sci Adv. 2022. PMID: 35714191 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Multi-Dimensional Vulnerabilities in the Himalayas.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912177. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36231508 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in perspective needed to forge 'no-regret' forest-based climate change mitigation strategies.Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2022 Mar;14(3):246-257. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12921. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2022. PMID: 35909989 Free PMC article.
-
The development of ecological civilization in China based on the economic-social-natural complex system.Ambio. 2023 Dec;52(12):1910-1927. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01937-x. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Ambio. 2023. PMID: 37889463 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous