Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies
- PMID: 33737441
- PMCID: PMC7978270
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045813
Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies
Abstract
Objective: Access to health services and adequate care is influenced by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic position (SEP) and the burden of comorbidities. Our study aimed to assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic further deepened these already existing health inequalities.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Data were collected from five longitudinal age-homogenous British cohorts (born in 2000-2002, 1989-1990, 1970, 1958 and 1946).
Participants: A web survey was sent to the cohorts. Anybody who responded to the survey was included, resulting in 14 891 eligible participants.
Main outcomes measured: The survey provided data on cancelled surgical or medical appointments, and the number of care hours received in a week during the first UK COVID-19 national lockdown.
Interventions: Using binary or ordered logistic regression, we evaluated whether these outcomes differed by sex, ethnicity, SEP and having a chronic illness. Adjustment was made for study design, non-response weights, psychological distress, presence of children or adolescents in the household, COVID-19 infection, key worker status, and whether participants had received a shielding letter. Meta-analyses were performed across the cohorts, and meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of age as a moderator.
Results: Women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55) and those with a chronic illness (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.05) experienced significantly more cancellations during lockdown (all p<0.0001). Ethnic minorities and those with a chronic illness required a higher number of care hours during the lockdown (both OR≈2.00, all p<0.002). SEP was not associated with cancellation or care hours. Age was not independently associated with either outcome in the meta-regression.
Conclusion: The UK government's lockdown approach during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have deepened existing health inequalities, impacting predominantly women, ethnic minorities and those with chronic illnesses. Public health authorities need to implement urgent policies to ensure equitable access to health and care for all in preparation for a fourthwave.
Keywords: epidemiology; public health; quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Impact of lockdown on key workers: findings from the COVID-19 survey in four UK national longitudinal studies.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Oct;75(10):955-962. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215889. Epub 2021 Apr 9. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021. PMID: 33837048 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May. PLoS Med. 2022. PMID: 35617423 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7629. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35452109 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 39949202
Cited by
-
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on impending cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in the UK.J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):20-21. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27305. Epub 2021 Sep 4. J Med Virol. 2022. PMID: 34453760 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A retrospective study on disease management in children and adolescents with phenylketonuria during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown in Austria.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Aug 19;16(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01996-x. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021. PMID: 34412683 Free PMC article.
-
The adoption of non-pharmaceutical interventions and the role of digital infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia, Ecuador, and El Salvador.EPJ Data Sci. 2023;12(1):18. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00395-5. Epub 2023 Jun 6. EPJ Data Sci. 2023. PMID: 37305560 Free PMC article.
-
The benefits, costs and feasibility of a low incidence COVID-19 strategy.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb;13:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100294. Epub 2022 Jan 2. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022. PMID: 35005678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social inequalities in medical appointment cancellations and reschedulings at the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic in France.Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):652-659. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae101. Eur J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38937956 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical