Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e045813.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045813.

Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies

Affiliations

Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies

Constantin-Cristian Topriceanu et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Access to health services and adequate care is influenced by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic position (SEP) and the burden of comorbidities. Our study aimed to assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic further deepened these already existing health inequalities.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Data were collected from five longitudinal age-homogenous British cohorts (born in 2000-2002, 1989-1990, 1970, 1958 and 1946).

Participants: A web survey was sent to the cohorts. Anybody who responded to the survey was included, resulting in 14 891 eligible participants.

Main outcomes measured: The survey provided data on cancelled surgical or medical appointments, and the number of care hours received in a week during the first UK COVID-19 national lockdown.

Interventions: Using binary or ordered logistic regression, we evaluated whether these outcomes differed by sex, ethnicity, SEP and having a chronic illness. Adjustment was made for study design, non-response weights, psychological distress, presence of children or adolescents in the household, COVID-19 infection, key worker status, and whether participants had received a shielding letter. Meta-analyses were performed across the cohorts, and meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of age as a moderator.

Results: Women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55) and those with a chronic illness (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.05) experienced significantly more cancellations during lockdown (all p<0.0001). Ethnic minorities and those with a chronic illness required a higher number of care hours during the lockdown (both OR≈2.00, all p<0.002). SEP was not associated with cancellation or care hours. Age was not independently associated with either outcome in the meta-regression.

Conclusion: The UK government's lockdown approach during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have deepened existing health inequalities, impacting predominantly women, ethnic minorities and those with chronic illnesses. Public health authorities need to implement urgent policies to ensure equitable access to health and care for all in preparation for a fourthwave.

Keywords: epidemiology; public health; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar charts illustrating the percentages of cancelled surgery, medical appointments or other medical procedures by sex, ethnicity and the presence of chronic illness across the five UK longitudinal cohorts, ordered by increasing age of the cohort from left to right. Error bars representing the 95% CIs are also presented. 1946 refers to NSHD; 1958 refers to NCDS; 1970 refers to BCS70; 1989–1990 refers to NS; 2000–2002 refers to MCS. BCS70, 1970 British Cohort Study; MCS, Millennium Cohort Study; NCDS, National Child Development Study; NS, Next Steps; NSHD, National Study of Health and Development.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar charts illustrating the percentage of participants requiring support based on the number of care hours needed during the UK COVID-19 national lockdown stratified by sex, ethnicity and the presence of chronic illness across the cohorts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bleich SN, Jarlenski MP, Bell CN, et al. . Health inequalities: trends, progress, and policy. Annu Rev Public Health 2012;33:7–40. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kojima G, Liljas AEM, Iliffe S. Frailty syndrome: implications and challenges for health care policy. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2019;12:23–30. 10.2147/RMHP.S168750 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mein SA. COVID-19 and Health Disparities: the Reality of “the Great Equalizer”. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:2439–40. 10.1007/s11606-020-05880-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aspell N, O'Sullivan M, O'Shea E, apos SM, et al. . Predicting admission to long-term care and mortality among community-based, dependent older people in Ireland. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019;34:999–1007. 10.1002/gps.5101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuh D, Pierce M, Adams J, et al. . Cohort profile: updating the cohort profile for the MRC national survey of health and development: a new clinic-based data collection for ageing research. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:e1–9. 10.1093/ije/dyq231 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources