Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale for Bipolar Disorder
- PMID: 33737809
- PMCID: PMC7966408
- DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S300761
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale for Bipolar Disorder
Abstract
Introduction: Unlike unipolar depression, depressive episode of bipolar disorder is often associated with clinical characteristics, such as atypical and mixed symptoms. However, there are currently no valid and reliable specific tools available to assess the specific psychiatric symptomatology of depressive episode of bipolar disorder in China. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder.
Methods: The sample of this study included 111 patients with bipolar disorder (30 male, 81 female). All participants were interviewed with the Chinese version of the BDRS (BDRS-C), the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). A psychometric analysis of the BDRS was conducted.
Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the BDRS-C reached a value of 0.869. The BDRS-C score and scores for the HAMD-17 (r = 0.819, p < 0.01), the MADRS (r = 0.882, p < 0.01) and the YMRS (r = 0.355, p < 0.01) exhibited significant positive correlations. Close correlations were observed between the mixed subscale score of the BDRS-C and the YMRS score (r = 0.784, p < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three factors: a primary depressive symptoms cluster, a secondary depressive symptoms cluster, and a mixed symptoms cluster.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of the BDRS has satisfactory psychometric properties. This is a valid and reliable instrument to assess depressive symptomatology in patients with bipolar disorder.
Keywords: bipolar disorder; depression; depressive episode; mania; psychiatry; psychometrics; rating scale.
© 2021 Chen et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Clinical assessment of bipolar depression: validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS).BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 15;16:239. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0958-7. BMC Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27417178 Free PMC article.
-
Transcultural adaption and validation of the Spanish version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS-S).J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 12. J Affect Disord. 2015. PMID: 25451403
-
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale.Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 4. Compr Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24889342
-
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627046 Review. French.
-
Asenapine: a review of its use in the management of mania in adults with bipolar I disorder.CNS Drugs. 2011 Mar;25(3):251-67. doi: 10.2165/11206700-000000000-00000. CNS Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21323396 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources