Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 2:13:1756287221997186.
doi: 10.1177/1756287221997186. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

Prostate cancer biomarkers and multiparametric MRI: is there a role for both in prostate cancer management?

Affiliations
Review

Prostate cancer biomarkers and multiparametric MRI: is there a role for both in prostate cancer management?

Anna Saltman et al. Ther Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Several advancements have been made in recent years with regards to the detection and evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa). The low specificity of prostate specific antigen (PSA) has left much to be desired in a test, but a boom in novel biomarkers has made screening and surveillance more complicated. Several attempts at identifying a niche for these tests has helped somewhat, but much is still undetermined about the benefit that each test provides. In addition to laboratory tests, advancements in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PIRADSv.2 scoring have provided significant benefit to the evaluation of PCa. With the widespread use of prostate imaging, it is important to re-evaluate the impact of novel biomarkers in the context of furthering PCa screening and management. In this review, we aim to assess the influence mpMRI has on the role of nine different novel biomarkers in the detection and evaluation of PCa. We performed a review of current peer-reviewed literature to assess this question. Much data has been published on the role of these tests, allowing for their placement into one of three best-fit categories: tests for biopsy-naïve men (Prostate Health Index, Mi Prostate Score, 4K Score); tests for men with prior negative biopsies (ConfirmMDx, Progensa PCA3); and men on active surveillance (OncotypeDx, Prolaris, Decipher). Data on the role of these tests with the use of mpMRI have not been comprehensive and excludes several of the markers. More research is needed to determine the combined impact mpMRI and the novel biomarkers on the evaluation and management of PCa.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Multiparametric MRI; Prostate Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Key Statistics for Prostate Cancer. Prostate cancer facts [Internet], https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/about/key-statistics.html (accessed 9 August 2020).
    1. Wolf AMD, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al.. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 70–98. - PubMed
    1. Potosky AL, Feuer EJ, Levin DL. Impact of screening on incidence and mortality of prostate cancer in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 2001; 23: 181–186. - PubMed
    1. Lu-Yao GL, McLerran D, Wasson J, et al.. An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geo-graphic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. JAMA 1993; 269: 2633–2636. - PubMed
    1. Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, et al.. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 1046–1055. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources