Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;13(2):e13304.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.13304.

Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Highly-Crosslinked-Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Findings of a Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Highly-Crosslinked-Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Findings of a Meta-Analysis

Abdulaziz Almaawi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction An optimal hip implant is biocompatible, durable, and resistant to chemical and mechanical wear. This analysis aimed to compare failure (revision) and complication rates between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (CoHXLPE) implants. Methods This review comprised of scientific literature published between 1995 and 2019. We included randomized controlled trials in adults (>18 years) that presented results of CoC and CoHXLPE total hip arthroplasty (THA) with more than two years of mean follow-up and drafted in English. The primary outcomes for this analysis were complications, revision rates, and loosening rates. Results Eight studies (1,689 hips) were included in this systematic review. There was no significant differences between COC and CoHXLPE for the risk of post-surgical complications (relative risk [RR]: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-4.69, P = 0.12). Revision rates (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.71-2.20, P = 0.43] and loosening rates between the two implants were not significantly different (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.30-4.52, P = 0.82). Conclusion We report no significant differences between CoHXLPE and CoC in adults undergoing primary THA. Although introduced relatively recently, CoHXLPE is a cost-effective bearing that can be used for younger patients with no risk of increased complications in comparison to CoC. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

Keywords: arthritis; arthroplasty; bearing surface; ceramic; coc; cop; hip; polyethylene; tha.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Basis of analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Post-surgical complication rate.
CoC: ceramic-on-ceramic; CoP: ceramic-on-polyethylene; df: degrees of freedom.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Revision rate.
CoC: ceramic-on-ceramic; CoP: ceramic-on-polyethylene; df: degrees of freedom.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Loosening.
CoC: ceramic-on-ceramic; CoP: ceramic-on-polyethylene; df: degrees of freedom.

References

    1. Geographical variation in incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 34,642 replacements. Mäkelä KT, Peltola M, Häkkinen U, Remes V. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:633–639. - PubMed
    1. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern MJJ. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:780–785. - PubMed
    1. Temporal trends and survivorship of total hip arthroplasty in very young patients: a study using the National Joint Registry data set. Metcalfe D, Peterson N, Wilkinson JM, Perry DC. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:1320–1329. - PubMed
    1. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. Varnum C. https://www.ortopaedi.dk/dosafhandlinger/Endeligafhandling280416.pdf Dan Med J. 2017;64:5350–28260601. - PubMed
    1. A randomised, controlled clinical study on total hip arthroplasty using 4 different bearings: results after 10 years. Borgwardt A, Zerahn B, Fabricius SD, Bertelsen TH, Daugaard H, Ribel-Madsen S. Hip In. 2017;27:96–103. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources