Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;60(4):1330-1349.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12454. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

The hers and his of prosociality across 10 countries

Maria I T Olsson  1 , Laura Froehlich  2 , Angela R Dorrough  3 , Sarah E Martiny  1
Affiliations

The hers and his of prosociality across 10 countries

Maria I T Olsson et al. Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Is there a 'more helpful' gender? The present research assessed gender differences in prosocial self-perceptions, prosocial behavioural intentions, and prosocial (transfer) behaviour in same- and other-gender interactions in 10 countries (N = 1,915). The present results showed negligible differences in the degree to which women and men saw themselves as prosocial. However, larger gender differences emerged in regard to prosocial behavioural intentions and prosocial (transfer) behaviours across different help contexts (i.e., same- vs. other-gender interactions). In a hypothetical work scenario, women reported greater prosocial behavioural intentions than men when the recipient of the help was of the same gender. In contrast, when the recipient of the help was of the other gender, men reported greater prosocial behavioural intentions than women. In addition, men transferred more than women to both same- and other-gender interaction partners in a prisoner's dilemma game. Taken together, the present findings suggest that there is no 'more helpful' gender. Instead, gender differences in prosociality are dynamic and contextual. Different theoretical perspectives are taken into consideration in discussing gender differences in the present research.

Keywords: communal; gender roles; prisoner’s dilemma; prosocial behaviour; social role theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
    1. Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 881-909. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025354
    1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Beyer, S. (2018). Low awareness of occupational segregation and the gender pay gap: No changes over a 16-year span. Current Psychology, 37(1), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9521-4
    1. Brañas-Garza, P., Capraro, V., & Rascon-Ramirez, E. (2018). Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour. Economics Letters, 170, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.022

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources