Quasispecies Theory in Virology
- PMID: 33739796
- PMCID: PMC135734
- DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.1.463-465.2002
Quasispecies Theory in Virology
Abstract
Holmes and Moya claim that quasispecies is an unnecessary and misleading description of RNA virus evolution, that virologists refer to quasispecies inappropriately, and that there is little evidence of quasispecies in RNA virus evolution. They wish to look for other ideas in evolutionary biology and to set down an agenda for future research. I argue here that real virus quasispecies often differ from the theoretical quasispecies as initially formulated and that this difference does not invalidate quasispecies as a suitable theoretical framework to understand viruses at the population level.
2002.
References
-
- Adami, C. 1998. Introduction to artificial life. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
-
- Arias, A., E. Lazaro, C. Escarmis, and E. Domingo. 2001. Molecular intermediates of fitness gain of an RNA virus: characterization of a mutant spectrum by biological and molecular cloning. J. Gen. Virol. 82:1049–1060. - PubMed
-
- Baranowski, E., C. M. Ruíz-Jarabo, P. Lim, and E. Domingo. 2001. Foot-and-mouth disease virus lacking the VP1 G-H loop: the mutant spectrum uncovers interactions among antigenic sites for fitness gain. Virology 288:192–202. - PubMed
-
- Biebricher, C. K. 1999. Mutation, competition and selection as measured with small RNA molecules, p. 65–85. In E. Domingo, R. G. Webster, and J. J. Holland (ed.), Origin and evolution of viruses. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
-
- Chao, L. 1990. Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller’s ratchet. Nature 348:454–455. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
