Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0248992.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248992. eCollection 2021.

Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study

Affiliations

Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study

Marcus Heise et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Few studies on diabetes self-management considered the patterns and relationships of different self-management behaviours (SMB). The aims of the present study are 1) to identify patterns of SMB among persons with diabetes, 2) to identify sociodemographic and disease-related predictors of SMB among persons with diabetes.

Research design and methods: The present analysis includes data of 1,466 persons (age 18 to 99 years; 44.0% female; 56.0% male) with diabetes (type I and II) from the population-based study German Health Update 2014/2015 (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS). We used latent class analysis in order to distinguish different patterns of self-management behaviours among persons with diabetes. The assessment of SMB was based on seven self-reported activities by respondents (dietary plan, diabetes-diary, diabetes health pass, self-assessment of blood glucose, self-examination of feet, retinopathy-screenings and assessment of HbA1c). Subsequent multinomial latent variable regressions identified factors that were associated with self-management behaviour.

Results: Latent class analysis suggested a distinction between three patterns of SMB. Based on modal posterior probabilities 42.8% of respondents showed an adherent pattern of diabetes self-management with above-average frequency in all seven indicators of SMB. 32.1% showed a nonadherent pattern with a below-average commitment in all seven forms of SMB. Another 25.1% were assigned to an ambivalent type, which showed to be adherent with regard to retinopathy screenings, foot examinations, and the assessment of HbA1c, yet nonadherent with regard to all other forms of SMB. In multivariable regression analyses, participation in Diabetes Self-Management Education programs (DSME) was the most important predictor of good self-management behaviour (marginal effect = 51.7 percentage points), followed by attentiveness towards one's personal health (31.0 percentage points). Respondents with a duration of illness of less than 10 years (19.5 percentage points), employed respondents (7.5 percentage points), as well as respondents with a high socioeconomic status (24.7 percentage points) were more likely to show suboptimal forms of diabetes self-management.

Discussion: In the present nationwide population-based study, a large proportion of persons with diabetes showed suboptimal self-management behaviour. Participation in a DSME program was the strongest predictor of good self-management. Results underline the need for continual and consistent health education for patients with diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Profiles of the latent self-management classes in the 3-group model with 7 indicator variables.
Conditional prevalences, n = 1,466.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Predicted posterior probabilities of the latent self-management classes by sociodemographic and disease-related factors within bivariate, multinomial latent variable regressions.
n = 1466, blue = adherent SMB pattern (n = 628); grey = mixed-type (n = 367); orange = nonadherent SMB pattern (n = 471) Abbreviations: DSME–structured education program for patients with diabetes mellitus, SES- socioeconomic status. All predicted probabilities according to the coefficients stated in Table 3, assuming other covariates are fixed at sample-specific means.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al.. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019; 157:107843. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Odgers‐Jewell K, Le Ball, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of group‐based self‐management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta‐analyses and meta‐regression. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017; 34:1027–39. 10.1111/dme.13340 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25:1159–71. 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powers MA, Bardsley JK, Cypress M, Funnell MM, Harms D, Hess-Fischl A, et al.. Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43:1636–49. 10.2337/dci20-0023 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:943–50. 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types