Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study
- PMID: 33740024
- PMCID: PMC7978380
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248992
Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study
Abstract
Objective: Few studies on diabetes self-management considered the patterns and relationships of different self-management behaviours (SMB). The aims of the present study are 1) to identify patterns of SMB among persons with diabetes, 2) to identify sociodemographic and disease-related predictors of SMB among persons with diabetes.
Research design and methods: The present analysis includes data of 1,466 persons (age 18 to 99 years; 44.0% female; 56.0% male) with diabetes (type I and II) from the population-based study German Health Update 2014/2015 (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS). We used latent class analysis in order to distinguish different patterns of self-management behaviours among persons with diabetes. The assessment of SMB was based on seven self-reported activities by respondents (dietary plan, diabetes-diary, diabetes health pass, self-assessment of blood glucose, self-examination of feet, retinopathy-screenings and assessment of HbA1c). Subsequent multinomial latent variable regressions identified factors that were associated with self-management behaviour.
Results: Latent class analysis suggested a distinction between three patterns of SMB. Based on modal posterior probabilities 42.8% of respondents showed an adherent pattern of diabetes self-management with above-average frequency in all seven indicators of SMB. 32.1% showed a nonadherent pattern with a below-average commitment in all seven forms of SMB. Another 25.1% were assigned to an ambivalent type, which showed to be adherent with regard to retinopathy screenings, foot examinations, and the assessment of HbA1c, yet nonadherent with regard to all other forms of SMB. In multivariable regression analyses, participation in Diabetes Self-Management Education programs (DSME) was the most important predictor of good self-management behaviour (marginal effect = 51.7 percentage points), followed by attentiveness towards one's personal health (31.0 percentage points). Respondents with a duration of illness of less than 10 years (19.5 percentage points), employed respondents (7.5 percentage points), as well as respondents with a high socioeconomic status (24.7 percentage points) were more likely to show suboptimal forms of diabetes self-management.
Discussion: In the present nationwide population-based study, a large proportion of persons with diabetes showed suboptimal self-management behaviour. Participation in a DSME program was the strongest predictor of good self-management. Results underline the need for continual and consistent health education for patients with diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Participation in structured diabetes self-management education programs and its associations with self-management behaviour - a nationwide population-based study.Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):843-850. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.017. Epub 2021 Jul 10. Patient Educ Couns. 2022. PMID: 34272129
-
Participation in structured diabetes mellitus self-management education program and association with lifestyle behavior: results from a population-based study.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1):e001066. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001066. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020. PMID: 32205327 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetes self-management education programs: Results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0310338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310338. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39264968 Free PMC article.
-
Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Engagement in Diabetes Self-management Education Among People With Diabetes in the United States.Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov;133(6):685-691. doi: 10.1177/0033354918794935. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Public Health Rep. 2018. PMID: 30223759 Free PMC article.
-
The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study.Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1604-12. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2533. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Diabetes Care. 2014. PMID: 24667462
Cited by
-
Identifying Patient Profiles for Developing Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: A Latent Class Cluster Analysis.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 May 13;15:1055-1063. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S355470. eCollection 2022. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022. PMID: 35592441 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic Illness Self-Management Latent Profiles in Individuals With Comorbid Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension.Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Jun;51(3):250-261. doi: 10.1177/26350106251336311. Epub 2025 May 14. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025. PMID: 40370006
-
Healthcare and health situation of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany: The study GEDA 2021/2022-Diabetes.J Health Monit. 2024 Jun 19;9(2):e12128. doi: 10.25646/12128. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Health Monit. 2024. PMID: 39081469 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral Engagement and Activation Model Study (BEAMS): A latent class analysis of adopters and non-adopters of digital health technologies among people with Type 2 diabetes.Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jul 27;14(8):491-498. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae034. Transl Behav Med. 2024. PMID: 38953616 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al.. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019; 157:107843. 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Odgers‐Jewell K, Le Ball, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of group‐based self‐management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta‐analyses and meta‐regression. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017; 34:1027–39. 10.1111/dme.13340 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Powers MA, Bardsley JK, Cypress M, Funnell MM, Harms D, Hess-Fischl A, et al.. Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43:1636–49. 10.2337/dci20-0023 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical