Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0248929.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248929. eCollection 2021.

Determinants of compliance to the facemask directive in Greece: A population study

Affiliations

Determinants of compliance to the facemask directive in Greece: A population study

Georgios Labiris et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: Primary objective of this study was to identify potential difficulties and/or discomfort when using a facemask. Moreover, to explore the impact of spectacles, contact lenses and visual acuity on the compliance to the facemask directive.

Methods: This is a prospective study that was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece between June 2020 and August 2020. Greek speaking citizens with permanent residency in Greece above 18 years old were included. A custom questionnaire (DeMask-20) was constructed and validated, which pertained to the perceived difficulty and discomfort when using a facemask. It contained 20 items grouped in 8 subscales (driving, near vision, distance vision, ocular discomfort, role limitation, collaboration, dependency on others, emotional stress). Perceived difficulty and discomfort when using a facemask, compliance and correlations of compliance with DeMask-20 scores, demographics, spectacle and/or contact lens use, and visual acuity were evaluated.

Results: The number of factors was determined through factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.716 for the "Role limitation" subscale to 0.938 for "Ocular discomfort" subscale. 1,214 participants (402 men, 812 women, mean age 36.79±12.50 years) completed the DeMask-20 instrument. Mean DeMask-20 score of all study participants was 3.79±0.71. Significant differences in DeMask-20 score were detected in gender (p = 0.009), spectacle use (p = 0.034), contact lens use (p = 0.049), and binocular distance visual acuity (bDVA) (p = 0.001). Mean compliance of all participants was 4.05±0.96. Men, people <50 years and spectacle wearers showed significantly worse compliance (p<0.05). Moreover, professional workers and professional drivers demonstrated significantly better compliance (p = 0.008 and p = 0.047). Significant correlation was detected between compliance and DeMask-20 score (p<0.001, R2 = 0.471). Significant correlations were detected with driving, near vision, distance vision, collaboration, role limitation, emotional stress (p<0.05, R2: 0.386-0.493).

Conclusions: Factor analysis suggested that the DeMask-20 instrument demonstrates adequate validity, while Cronbach's alpha indicated sufficient internal consistency of all subscales. This study provided the necessary methods that could evaluate compliance trends and the efficacy of healthcare interventions against COVID-19. Our outcomes suggest that young males who use spectacles should be targeted by Greek Healthcare authorities in order to improve compliance rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Scree plot of the eigenvalues of the factors after factor analysis.
Six factors with eigenvalue > 1.0 were found.
Fig 2
Fig 2. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to gender.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.
Fig 3
Fig 3. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to spectacle use.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.
Fig 4
Fig 4. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to contact lens use.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.
Fig 5
Fig 5. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to reported binocular distance visual acuity.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.
Fig 6
Fig 6. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to age.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.
Fig 7
Fig 7. DeMask-20 score and subscores according to vulnerability.
*statistical significance, error bars: standard deviation.

References

    1. Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chuang VW, et al.. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020;81(1):107–14. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ, et al.. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–87. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Worldometer, COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. [cited 2020 October 21]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
    1. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS, et al.. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):460–71. 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. King FM. Covid-19: face masks could foster distrust and blame. BMJ. 2020;369:m2009. 10.1136/bmj.m2009 - DOI - PubMed