Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):1679-1687.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab029.

Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999-2006

Maria Cristina Gonzalez  1   2 , Ali Mehrnezhad  3 , Nariman Razaviarab  3 , Thiago G Barbosa-Silva  4 , Steven B Heymsfield  2
Affiliations

Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999-2006

Maria Cristina Gonzalez et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Calf circumference (CC) is used in geriatric studies as a simple and practical skeletal muscle (SM) marker for diagnosing low SM and sarcopenia. Currently applied CC cutoff points were developed in samples including older participants; values representative of the full adult lifespan are lacking.

Objectives: We aimed to develop CC cutoff points and to identify relevant confounding factors from the large and diverse NHANES 1999-2006 population sample.

Methods: Demographic, anthropometric, and imaging data (DXA, appendicular lean mass) from the adult (age ≥18 y) NHANES sample were partitioned into subgroups according to sex, age, ethnicity, and race. Adults aged 18-39 y and BMI (in kg/m2) 18.5-24.9 were set as a reference population; CC cutoff points were derived at 1 and 2 SDs below the mean.

Results: The sample included 17,789 participants, 51.3% males and 48.7% females, with respective ages (mean ± SD) of 43.3 ± 16.1 y and 45.5 ± 16.9 y. CC was strongly correlated with appendicular lean mass, r = 0.84 and 0.86 for males and females (both P < 0.001), respectively. Significant differences in mean CC were present across sex, ethnic, self-reported race, and BMI groups. Adjusting CC for adiposity using BMI revealed a decrease in CC beginning after the second decade in males and third decade in females. Rounded CC cutoff values for moderately and severely low CC were 34 cm and 32 cm (males), and 33 cm and 31 cm (females), respectively. Our findings support the use of BMI-adjusted CC values for participants outside the normal-weight BMI range (18-24.9).

Conclusions: This study defined CC values in a diverse population sample along with a BMI-adjustment approach that helps to remove the confounding effects of adiposity and thereby improves CC as a useful clinical estimate of SM mass.

Keywords: anthropometry; body composition; calf circumference; cutoff; malnutrition; muscle mass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Correlation, linear regression, and coefficient of determination (R^2) between appendicular lean mass index (ALMI) and calf circumference in males (n = 9134, black dots) and females (n = 8655, gray dots). Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.80 (males and females).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of calf circumference values according to age, ethnicity, and race, for (A) males (n = 9134) and (B) females (n = 8655).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Unadjusted and BMI-adjusted calf circumference (mean and limits of 95% confidence interval) according to age for males (n = 9134) and females (n = 8655). (A) unadjusted males, (B) BMI-adjusted males, (C) unadjusted females, and (D) BMI-adjusted females.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Distribution of calf circumference values according to age and BMI categories, for (A) males (n = 9134) and (B) females (n = 8655).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Low calf circumference (CC) prevalence according to BMI. Moderately or severely low CC: 1 (triangles) and 2 (circles) SDs below the mean from the reference population, respectively. Solid lines: using ethnicity and race-specific BMI adjustment factors and cutoff values. Dotted lines: using CC raw values and ethnicity and race-specific cutoff values. adj., adjusted.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Later W, Bosy-Westphal A, Kossel E, Gluer CC, Heller M, Muller MJ. Is the 1975 Reference Man still a suitable reference?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:1035–42. - PubMed
    1. Argiles JM, Campos N, Lopez-Pedrosa JM, Rueda R, Rodriguez-Manas L. Skeletal muscle regulates metabolism via interorgan crosstalk: roles in health and disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:789–96. - PubMed
    1. Deutz NEP, Ashurst I, Ballesteros MD, Bear DE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Genton L, Landi F, Laviano A, Norman K, Prado CM. The underappreciated role of low muscle mass in the management of malnutrition. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20:22–7. - PubMed
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donini LM, Busetto L, Bauer JM, Bischoff S, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Dicker D, Fruhbeck G, Giustina A et al. Critical appraisal of definitions and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity based on a systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:2368–88. - PubMed

Publication types