Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;36(7):2021-2029.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06676-x. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Comparative Effectiveness of a Complex Care Program for High-Cost/High-Need Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Comparative Effectiveness of a Complex Care Program for High-Cost/High-Need Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Douglas W Roblin et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: High-cost/high-need (HCHN) adults and the healthcare systems that provide their care may benefit from a new patient-centered model of care involving a dedicated physician and nurse team who coordinate both clinical and social services for a small patient panel.

Objective: Evaluate the impact of a Complex Care Program (CCP) on likelihood of patient survival and hospital admission in 180 days following empanelment to the CCP.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental design with CCP patients propensity score matched to a concurrent control group of eligible but unempaneled patients.

Setting: Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS) during 2017-2018.

Participants: Nine hundred twenty-nine CCP patients empaneled January 2017-June 2018, 929 matched control patients for the same period.

Interventions: The KPMAS CCP is a new program consisting of 8 teams each staffed by a physician and nurse who coordinate care across a continuum of specialty care, tertiary care, and community services for a panel of 200 patients with advanced clinical disease and recent hospitalizations.

Main outcomes: Time to death and time to first hospital admission in the 180 days following empanelment or eligibility.

Results: Compared to matched control patients, CCP patients had prolonged time to death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.577, 95% CI: 0.474, 0.704), and CCP decedents had longer survival (median days 69.5 vs. 53.0, p=0.03). CCP patients had similar time to hospital admission (HR: 1.081, 95% CI: 0.930, 1.258), with similar results when adjusting for competing risk of death (HR: 1.062, 95% CI: 0.914, 1.084).

Limitations: Non-randomized intervention; single healthcare system; patient eligibility limited to specific conditions.

Conclusion: The KPMAS CCP was associated with significantly reduced short-term mortality risk for eligible patients who volunteered to participate in this intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose. Drs. McCarthy, Mendiratta, and Roblin are affiliated with the medical group which designed and implemented the intervention.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CCP evaluation study cohort: allocation of patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to death following the index date in the propensity score matched dataset. The graph shows the cumulative hazard of death from the index date to 180 days out within the propensity score matched data set.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first medical/surgical hospital admission following the index date in the propensity score matched dataset. The graph shows the cumulative hazard of next medical/surgical hospital admission from the index date to 180-days out within the propensity score matched dataset.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen SB. The Concentration and Persistence in the Level of Health Expenditures over Time: Estimates for the U.S. Population, 2011-2012. Statistical Brief #449 (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1657–1658. - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, Lumpkin J, Selberg J. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients: An Urgent priority. New Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):909–911. - PubMed
    1. Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: A 2012 Update. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cross DA, Cohen GR, Lemak CH, Adler-Milstein J. Outcomes for high-needs patients: Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge. Health Aff. 2017;36(3):476–484. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources