Same/different concept learning by primates and birds
- PMID: 33742425
- DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00456-z
Same/different concept learning by primates and birds
Abstract
Same/different abstract-concept learning experiments were conducted with two primate species and three avian species by progressively increasing the size of the training stimulus set of distinctly different pictures from eight to 1,024 pictures. These same/different learning experiments were trained with two pictures presented simultaneously. Transfer tests of same and different learning employed interspersed trials of novel pictures to assess the level of correct performance on the very first time of subjects had seen those pictures. All of the species eventually performed these tests with high accuracy, contradicting the long-accepted notion that nonhuman animals are unable to learn the concept of same/different. Capuchin and rhesus monkeys learned the concept more readily than did pigeons. Clark's nutcrackers and black-billed magpies learned as readily as monkeys, and even showed a slight advantage with the smallest training stimulus sets. Those tests of same/different learning were followed by delay procedures, such that a delay was introduced after the subjects responded to the sample picture and before the test picture. In the sequential same/different task, accuracy was shown to diminish when the stimulus on a previous trial matched the test picture previously shown on a different trial. This effect is known as proactive interference. The pigeons' proactive interference was greater at 10-s delays than 1-s delays, revealing time-based interference. By contrast, time delays had little or no effect on rhesus monkeys' proactive interference, suggesting that rhesus monkeys have better explicit memory of where and when they saw the potential interfering picture, revealing better event-based memory.
Keywords: Black-billed magpies; Clark’s nutcrackers; Concept learning; Interference; Pigeons; Primates; Working memory.
Similar articles
-
Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 29492785 Review.
-
Corvids Outperform Pigeons and Primates in Learning a Basic Concept.Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):437-444. doi: 10.1177/0956797616685871. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Psychol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28151701
-
Testing complex animal cognition: Concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jan;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1002/jeab.299. Epub 2018 Jan 2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018. PMID: 29293262
-
Concept learning set-size functions for Clark's nutcrackers.J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):76-84. doi: 10.1002/jeab.174. Epub 2015 Nov 29. J Exp Anal Behav. 2016. PMID: 26615450
-
Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):141-151. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01702-9. Epub 2022 Oct 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36222938 Review.
Cited by
-
Emotion Labeling in Pigeons.Affect Sci. 2024 Dec 12;6(2):356-368. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00287-5. eCollection 2025 Jun. Affect Sci. 2024. PMID: 40605948
-
Humans may not have a uniquely enhanced sequence memory: sequence discrimination is facilitated by causal-logical framing in humans and chimpanzees.R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jul 16;12(7):250236. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250236. eCollection 2025 Jul. R Soc Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40727398 Free PMC article.
-
Visuo-spatial compound stimuli discrimination with (Gryllus pennsylvanicus) in two-choices rewarding learning tasks.Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 12;27(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01903-4. Anim Cogn. 2024. PMID: 39531092 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus-dependent emergence of understanding the 'same-different' concept in budgerigars.Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Dec;291(2036):20241862. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1862. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Proc Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39657807
-
Basic Emotions or Constructed Emotions: Insights From Taking an Evolutionary Perspective.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 May;20(3):377-391. doi: 10.1177/17456916231205186. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025. PMID: 37916982 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Clary, D., & Kelly, D. M. (2011). Cache protection strategies of a non-social food-caching corvid, Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). Animal Cognition, 14, 735–744. - DOI
-
- Clary & Kelly, D. M. (2013). Are Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) able to discriminate knowledge states of human experimenters during an object-choice task? Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 628–646. - DOI
-
- Clary, D., & Kelly, D. M. (2016). Graded mirror self-recognition by Clark’s nutcrackers. Scientific Reports, 6, 36459.ly, 2013.
-
- Devkar, D. T., & Wright, A. A. (2016). Event based proactive interference by rhesus monkeys. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 1474–1482. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1005-x .
-
- Dunbar, R. I. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5%3C178::AID-EVAN5%3E3.0.... .
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources