Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;14(4):826-839.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Ischemia-Mediated Dysfunction in Subpapillary Myocardium as a Marker of Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Affiliations

Ischemia-Mediated Dysfunction in Subpapillary Myocardium as a Marker of Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Jonathan D Kochav et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to test whether ischemia-mediated contractile dysfunction underlying the mitral valve affects functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and the prognostic impact of FMR.

Background: FMR results from left ventricular (LV) remodeling, which can stem from myocardial tissue alterations. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance can assess ischemia and infarction in the left ventricle and papillary muscles; relative impact on FMR is uncertain.

Methods: Vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease at 7 sites. Images were centrally analyzed for MR etiology/severity, mitral apparatus remodeling, and papillary ischemia.

Results: A total of 8,631 patients (mean age 60.0 ± 14.1 years; 55% male) were studied. FMR was present in 27%, among whom 16% (n = 372) had advanced (moderate or severe) FMR. Patients with ischemia localized to subpapillary regions were more likely to have advanced FMR (p = 0.003); those with ischemia localized to other areas were not (p = 0.17). Ischemic/dysfunctional subpapillary myocardium (odds ratio: 1.24/10% subpapillary myocardium; confidence interval: 1.17 to 1.31; p < 0.001) was associated with advanced FMR controlling for infarction. Among a subgroup with (n = 372) and without (n = 744) advanced FMR matched (1:2) on infarct size/distribution, patients with advanced FMR had increased adverse mitral apparatus remodeling, paralleled by greater ischemic/dysfunctional subpapillary myocardium (p < 0.001). Although posteromedial papillary ischemia was more common with advanced FMR (p = 0.006), subpapillary ischemia with dysfunction remained associated (p < 0.001), adjusting for posteromedial papillary ischemia (p = 0.074). During follow-up (median 5.1 years), 1,473 deaths occurred in the overall cohort; advanced FMR conferred increased mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.25 to 1.86; p < 0.001) controlling for left ventricular ejection fraction, infarction, and ischemia.

Conclusions: Ischemic and dysfunctional subpapillary myocardium provides a substrate for FMR, which predicts mortality independent of key mechanistic substrates.

Keywords: cardiac magnetic resonance; ischemia; mitral regurgitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL128278 (Drs. Weinsaft, Ratcliffe, Levine, and J. Kim), R01 HL128099 and R01 HL141917 (Dr. Levine), R01-HL63348 (Dr. Ratcliffe), K23 HL140092 (Dr. J. Kim), K23 HL132011 (Dr. Shenoy), and T32 HL7854-23 (Dr. Kochav). It was also funded by the Glorney-Raisbeck Fellowship/NY Academy of Medicine (Dr. Kochav). Dr. Judd has an equity interest. Dr. R. Kim serves on the Board of Directors. Mr. Cargile is an employee of Heart Imaging Technologies. Dr. Klem is a consultant for and receives speaker honorarium from Bayer; and receives funding from Medtronic. Dr. Karmpaliotis receives funding from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Abiomed; and has equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr. Leon receives funding from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr. Weinsaft has received speaker honoraria from GE Healthcare. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Design
Schematic of multicenter image/data acquisition, de-identification, and centralized core lab analysis. All sites employed a similar stress CMR protocol. Ancillary clinical data were collected using a standardized reporting system, as were global LV chamber size/function, regional contractility, infarction, and ischemia. Mortality was obtained via the SSDI. Data were de-identified prior to core lab analyses, including assessment of MR etiology and severity in all patients, and papillary muscle ischemia and mitral apparatus geometric indices among a nested case-control cohort of patients with and without advanced FMR (bottom left: yellow arrow denotes papillary muscle ischemia, middle: yellow lines denote annular diameter and tenting height, fill denotes tenting area, right: yellow line denotes inter-papillary muscle distance).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mitral Apparatus Partitions.
2A. Bullseye plot (17-segment model) illustrating LV wall myocardium subtended within the mitral apparatus, which was defined as segments adjacent to the anterolateral and posteromedial papillary muscles (blue denotes sub-papillary regions [basal-mid anterior/anterolateral, inferior/inferolateral walls]). 2B. Converged bullseye plots depicting associations of FMR with LV wall ischemia (left) and infarction (right) localized to sub-papillary regions (blue) or regions anatomically distant from the papillary muscles (grey): Patients with ischemia or infarction isolated to sub-papillary regions were more likely to have advanced FMR (both p<0.01), whereas those with ischemia or infarction isolated to other regions were not (p=NS).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Representative Examples
Examples of LV sub-papillary ischemia in patients with and without advanced FMR, illustrating hypothesized modulatory impact of contractile dysfunction. 3A. Advanced FMR: Stress CMR-evidenced ischemia involving the LV inferior, inferoseptal, and inferolateral walls (top left [arrow denotes perfusion defect]), which were viable on LGE-CMR (top right). Note impaired contractile function in ischemic territories as discerned by cine-CMR (middle left: short axis, middle right: 2-chamber orientation [arrow denotes dysfunctional region]). Quantitative analysis demonstrated advanced FMR (regurgitant fraction 33%, volume 31ml) [bottom left: phase contrast CMR, bottom right: differential LV/aortic stroke volume). 3B. No FMR: Stress CMR-evidenced ischemia involving LV inferior wall and inferoseptum (top left), which were viable on LGE-CMR (top right). Cine-CMR demonstrated preserved contractility in ischemic territories (middle left: short axis, middle right 2-chamber orientation). Quantitative analysis demonstrated equivalent LV-aortic stroke volume, consistent with absence of MR.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Mortality in Relation to FMR Severity
Kaplan-Meier survival curves depicting all-cause mortality among groups stratified based on FMR severity. Mortality increased in relation to FMR severity (p<0.001), including when patients with mild FMR were compared to those with no FMR as well as among patients with advanced FMR in relation to all other groups.
Central Illustration:
Central Illustration:. Sub-Papillary Ischemia is Associated with Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Multicenter data from the SCMR registry demonstrated stress CMR evidenced LV ischemia underlying the mitral valve to be a key determinant of FMR. Extent of ischemic and dysfunctional LV myocardium in sub-papillary segments remained associated with FMR when controlling for LV infarction in corresponding territories or papillary muscle ischemia. During follow-up, mortality risk increased in proportion to severity of FMR: FMR severity remained associated with increased mortality even after adjustment for conventional prognostic indices and determinants of FMR (LV ischemia, infarction, dysfunction).

Comment in

References

    1. Groarke JD CB, O’Gara PT, Fuster V, Harrington RA, Narula J, Eapen ZJ. Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. In: H JW, editor Hurst’s The Heart. 14 ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.
    1. Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation 2001;103:1759–64. - PubMed
    1. Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Nkomo VT et al. Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2005;111:295–301. - PubMed
    1. Perez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Quezada M et al. Functional mitral regurgitation after a first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: contribution to congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2866–72. - PubMed
    1. Cavalcante JL, Kusunose K, Obuchowski NA et al. Prognostic Impact of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Severity and Myocardial Infarct Quantification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources