Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 33744207
- PMCID: PMC9853943
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.024
Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who predominantly underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), comparing those treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel.
Background: The effect of CYP2C19 genotype on treatment outcomes with ticagrelor or prasugrel compared with clopidogrel is unclear.
Methods: Databases through February 19, 2020, were searched for studies reporting the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on ischemic outcomes during ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel treatment. Study eligibility required outcomes reported for CYP2C19 genotype status and clopidogrel and alternative P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with CAD with at least 50% undergoing PCI. The primary analysis consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A secondary analysis was conducted by adding non-RCTs to the primary analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the 2 drug regimens and test interaction with CYP2C19 genotype.
Results: Of 1,335 studies identified, 7 RCTs were included (15,949 patients, mean age 62 years; 77% had PCI, 98% had acute coronary syndromes). Statistical heterogeneity was minimal, and risk for bias was low. Ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with clopidogrel resulted in a significant reduction in ischemic events (relative risk: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.83) in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers but not in noncarriers (relative risk: 1.0; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.25). The test of interaction on the basis of CYP2C19 genotype status was statistically significant (p = 0.013), suggesting that CYP2C19 genotype modified the effect. An additional 4 observational studies were found, and adding them to the analysis provided the same conclusions (p value of the test of interaction <0.001).
Conclusions: The effect of ticagrelor or prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events in patients with CAD who predominantly undergo PCI is based primarily on the presence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function carrier status. These results support genetic testing prior to prescribing P2Y12 inhibitor therapy.
Keywords: CYP2C19 genotype; clopidogrel; ischemic outcomes; meta-analysis; prasugrel; systematic review; ticagrelor.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Funding for this research was provided by National Institutes of Health grants U01HL128606 and 3U01HL128606-03S1. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Figures
Comment in
-
Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 12;14(7):751-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Mar 17. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 33744206 No abstract available.
-
Precision Antiplatelet Therapy for CYP2C19 Genotype Variants for Achieving Better Clinical Outcomes.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1500-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.004. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 34238560 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Precision Antiplatelet Therapy for CYP2C19 Genotype Variants for Achieving Better Clinical Outcomes.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1501. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.014. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 34238561 No abstract available.
References
-
- Holmes DR, Dehmer GJ, Kaul S, Leifer D, O’Gara PT, Stein CM. ACCF/AHA clopidogrel clinical alert: Approaches to the FDA ‘Boxed Warning’. Circulation 2010;122:537–557. - PubMed
-
- Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med 2007;357:2001–2015. - PubMed
-
- Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med 2009;361:1045–1057. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
